CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF REVERSAL OF HARTMANN’S PROCEDURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2022.1.13043Keywords:
Hartmann’s procedure, reversal, anastomotic leakageAbstract
Background. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) is one of the most complex surgical interventions in abdominal surgery with high morbidity rates of up to 58% in the patients after HP and mortality of up to 3.6%.
Objective. This was a retrospective observational study to analyze the Hartmann’s reversal (HR) outcomes.
Methods. The study involved 31 patients (16 males and 15 females), average age 59.6±10.31 (range 26-80), who underwent HR at Ternopil Regional Hospital in 2010 - 2021. The reasons for the HP were: cancer in 20 (64.5%) cases, perforation of the diverticulum – 6 (19.3%), traumatic rupture – 3 (9.7%) and Crohn’s disease - 2 (6.4%) cases.
Results. Median time from Hartmann’s procedure to reversal was 11.13±9.24 months (interval 3-38). Intraoperative time was 210.33±56.91 minutes (range 120-330). HR was performed in 30 (96.8 %) patients. Dense pelvic adhesions of the stump of the rectum was diagnosed in 13 (41.9%) patients. Hand-sewn anastomosis was performed for 22 (71%) patients, stapler anastomosis – 4 (12.9%), pull-through technique – 3 (9.7%) patients. AL occurred in 3 (9.7%) patients on the 15th, 23rd and 35th postoperative days. pseudomembranous colitis was diagnosed in 2 (6.4%) patients with AL. The mortality rate was 1 (3.3%) as a result of septic complications due to AL; this case was not operated by a colorectal surgeon due to administrative issue in the hospital.
Conclusions. Hartmann’s reversal is still one of the most difficult operations in colorectal surgery with high incidence of postoperative complications. Sound selection of patients with low comorbidity and in suitable time period is crucial for successful HR.
References
Alberto Bitran, Roberto Rasslan, Fabio de Oliveira Ferreira, Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama, Samir Rasslan. Hartmann’s reversal as a safe procedure for selected patients: analysis of 199 patients at a high-volume center in Sao Paulo. Surg Today. 2020; 50(8):855-62.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-01957-0.
Chen Z, Nair N, Hanif U. Outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a single centre experience. Cureus. 2021;13(8): e17242.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17242.
Chavrier D, Alves A, Menahem B. Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann’s reversal? An updated meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2022;26(4):239-52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02560-2.
Hess GF, Schäfer J, Rosenthal R, Kettelhack C, Oertli D. Reversal after Hartmann’s procedure in patients with complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(6):582-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13553.
Horesh N, Lessing Y, Rudnicki Y, Kent I, Kammar H, Ben-Yaacov A et al. Timing of colostomy reversal following Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(5):395-400.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.01.005.
Horesh N, Rudnicki Y, Dreznik Y, Zbar AP, Gutman M, Zmora O et al. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: still a complicated operation. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(2):81-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1735-4.
Nir Horesh, Yonatan Lessing, Yaron Rudnicki, Ilan Kent, Haguy Kammar, Almog Ben-Yaacov et al. Considerations for Hartmann’s reversal and Hartmann’s reversal outcomes-a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(11):1577-82.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2897-2.
Hallam S, Mothe BS, Tirumulaju RMR. Hartmann’s procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:301–7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who sent their manuscript to International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY-NC that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
