NETWORK-CENTRIC EXPERTS INTERACTION IN THE NARRATIVE DISCOURSE FORMAT

Authors

  • O. O. Holovin The Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • O. Ye. Stryzhak The Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • V. Yu. Velychko The Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2020.4.11888

Abstract

Background. The methodological bases and tools for providing information-analytical activity of experts in the process of using and processing large volumes of information arrays are described. The aim of the work was to determine the methodological principles and tools that ensure the transformation of unstructured documents in the format of interactive knowledge bases.

Materials and methods. Results. The basic functional categories of interaction with the distributed information are defined, namely: structuring, classification, criterization, synthesis and estimation. Theoretical bases of transformation of narrative descriptions of documents into a format of interactive systems of knowledge are considered. To do this, a certain set of tools is defined — taxonomy, ontology, indexing, search, intertextual linking, selection, aggregation of cognitive functions, etc.

Conclusions. Transdisciplinarity realizes the reflexive and recursive properties of the whole information space. The primary is the formation of taxonomies that reflect the semantic content of each document. The use of these tools creates the conditions for the implementation of information and analytical activities of experts.

References

Stryzhak, O., Prykhodniuk, V., Podlipaiev, V. (2018). Model of Transdisciplinary Representation of GEOspatial Information. Advances in Information and Communication Technologies. UKRMICO 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Cham, Vol. 560.

Stryzhak, O. Ye. (2020). Taxonomic principles of narrative discourse. Medical Informatics and Engineering, 2, 137-147. [in Ukrainian].

Nicolescu, B. (2008). Transdisciplinarity - Theory and Practice. Cresskill, NJ, USA : Hampton Press.

Palagin, A. (2014). Transdisciplinarity, computer science and development of modern civilization. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 7, 25-33. [in Russian].

Elson, D. K. (2012). Modeling Narrative Discourse. New York City : Columbia University.

Riedl, M. O., Bulitko, V. (2013). Interactive narrative: An intelligent systems approach. AI Magazine, 34 (1), 67-77.

Shyrokov, V. A. (2017). Language. Information. System: Transdisciplinarity in linguistics. Kyiv. [in Russian].

Konar, A. (2005). Cognitive Engineering: A Distributed Approach to Machine Intelligence. Series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, Cham.

The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering. Edited by J. D. Lee and A. Kirlik. 2013. URL: https:// www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780199757183.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199757183.

Shatalkin, A. I. (2012). Taxonomy. Grounds, principles and rules. Moscow: Tovarishhestvo nauchnyh izdanij KMK. [in Russian].

Mayer-Schonberger, V., Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Gladun, V. (1994). Processes of formation of new knowledge. Sophia : SD «Teacher 6».

Fridman, L. M. (2001). Fundamentals of problemology. Series: Problemology. Moscow : Sinteg. [in Russian].

Piaget J. (1951). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Vaisfeld, M. (2004). Object oriented thinking. Saint Petersburg : Piter. [in Russian].

Malyshevsky, A. (1998). Qualitative models in the theory of complex. Moscow : Fizmatlit. [in Russian].

Gorborukov, V., Stryzhak, O., Franchuk, O. (2013). Use of ontologies in decision-support systems. Mathematical modeling in economics: collection of scientific works. Kyiv. NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space, Institute of Economics and Forecasting, Institute of Cybernetics named after Glushkov, 33-39.

Hladun, V. P., Vaschenko, N. D., Velychko, V. Yu., Tkachenko, Yu. H. (2004). Structuring and Analyzing Data in Growing Pyramid Networks. Systemni doslidzhennia ta informatsijni tekhnolohii, 1, 82-92. [in Russian].

Saaty, T. (1990). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications.

Horborukov, V. V. (2018). Technological support of the ontological superconduct for the connection of ranking tasks. Extended abstract of candidates thesis. Kyiv. Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space. [in Ukrainian].

Voevodsky, V. (2011). Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. Proceedings of Logic, Language, Information and Computation WoLLIC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelber, Springer, 664.

Published

2021-06-10

How to Cite

Holovin, O. O., Stryzhak, O. Y., & Velychko, V. Y. (2021). NETWORK-CENTRIC EXPERTS INTERACTION IN THE NARRATIVE DISCOURSE FORMAT. Medical Informatics and Engineering, (4), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2020.4.11888

Issue

Section

Articles