THE LOGIC OF USING THE PORTFOLIO IN ENSURING THE QUALITY OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE DOCTOR. ANALYTICAL REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2017.3.8144Keywords:
portfolio, postgraduate medical education, continuous professional development, quality of education, assessment of doctor’s competencies, Miller’s pyramid, e-portfolio, portfolio reliability.Abstract
The problem of using the portfolio as a personal oriented technology for improving the quality of medical education is considered. It is emphasized that the "Portfolio" is currently an effective tool for objectifying and quantifying educational and professional growth in education and continuous professional development of the doctor. It can also be used to assess social relations and competencies that are difficult to assess in other ways. Portfolio can be widely used to demonstrate the acquisition of competences in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary areas of medicine, as well as the development of non-clinical skills.
Attention is also focused on the fact that the portfolio in postgraduate medical education is applicable to support the physician's reflexive practice, knowledge management and knowledge transfer management at the organizational and individual levels. However, the creation of an e-portfolio requires a global harmonization of the content of training, professional activity and assessment of the improvement of the doctor in professional conditions.
References
Get'man, N. A., Kotenko, E. N., & Petrukhina, O. A. (2015). Autentichnye sposoby otsenivaniya uchebnykh dostizhenii studentov meditsinskogo vuza [Authentic ways of assessing the academic achievements of medical students]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii (Pedagogical Education in Russia), 1, 22-24.
Get'man, N. A., & Kotenko, E. N. (2014). Portfolio kak
sovremennaya tekhnologiya otsenivaniya uchebnykh dostizhenii studentov [Portfolio as a modern technology for assessing students' academic achievements]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii (Pedagogical Education in Russia), 2, 22-28.
Grivennaya, E. N. (2013). Portfolio-tekhnologiya v kontekste sovremennykh sistem otsenki nauchno-pedagogicheskoi deyatel'nosti professorsko-prepodavatel'skogo sostava vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya [Portfolio-technology in the context of modern systems for assessing the scientific and pedagogical activity of the teaching staff of a higher educational institution]. Obshchestvo i pravo (Society and Law), 3, 273-276.
Zvonnikov, V. I. (2009). Kontrol' kachestva obucheniya
pri attestatsii. Kompetentnostnyi podkhod [Control of the quality of training in attestation. Competence approach]. Moscow: Logos.
Kiysin, L. P. (2008). Tolkovyi slovar' inoyazychnykh slov
[Explanatory dictionary of foreign words]. Moscow: Eksmo.
Nesterov, A. V. (2012). O nepreryvnom professional'nom
obrazovanii [On continuing professional education]. Kompetentnost' (Competence), 2(93), 4-11.
Prokop'eva, N. V. (2007). Lektsiya 2. Rezul'taty obucheniya. Urovni usvoeniya uchebnogo materiala [Lecture 2. Learning outcomes. Levels of learning material]. KSPU.
Slavin, B. B. (n. d.). Zakat universitetov [Sunset of universities]. AiTi (IT). Retrieved from http://www.it.ru/ press_center/blog/4967/
Ward, P. (2006). 360-degree feedback. Moscow: HIPPO.
Eichinger, R. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (n. d.). Rezyumiruem znaniya po metodike «360 gradusov» [Knowledge summary series: 360-degree assessment]. HR-Life.ru. Retrieved from http://www.hr-life.ru/article/ rezyumiruem-znaniya-po-metodike-360-gradusov
Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Ginsburg, S., & Hatala, R. (2015). A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework. Med. Educ., 49(6), 560-575. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
Cooke, M. D., Irby M., & O'Brien, B. C. (2010). Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, M. H., Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2006). Portfolios, projects and dissertations. Dent J. A. , Harden R. M. (eds.). A practical guide for medical teachers. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
Davis, M. H., Friedman, M., Howie, P. (2001) Portfolio assessment in medical students' final examinations. Med Teach, 23, 357-366.
E-portfolio. The Foundation Programme. Retrieved from http://www.foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/pages/ home/e-portfolio.
Flexner, A. Medical education in the United States and Canada. New York: The Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. Bulletin 4.
Haldane, T. (2014). «Portfolios» as a method of assessment in medical education. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench., 7(2), 89-93.
JAG Endoscopy Training System. JETS. Retrieved from http://www.jets.nhs.uk.
Jenkins, L., Mash, B., Derese, A. (2013). Reliability testing of a portfolio assessment tool for postgraduate family medicine training in South Africa. Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med., 5(1), 577. doi: 10.4102/phcfm. v5i1.577.
Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448-457.
Tochel, C., Haig, A, Hesketh, A, Cadzow, A, Beggs, K, Colthart, I, Peacock, H. (2009). The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach., 31(4), 299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
Driessen, E. W., Overeem, K., van Tartwijk, J, van der Vleuten, C. P., & A. M. Muijtjens. (2006). Validity of portfolio assessment: which qualities determine ratings? Med. Educ., 40(9), 862-866.
Ha, J. F., Longnecker, N. (2010) Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J, 10, 38-43.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: Longman, 352.
Bloom, B. S. (1994) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman, 208.
Kulakova, Ye. N., Kondrat'yeva, I. V., Volosovets, G. G. et al. (2015) Rezul'taty obucheniya budushchikh pediatrov: modeli i metody planirovaniya [The results of training for future pediatrics: models and methods of planning] // Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 3. Retrieved from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19382.
Al-Eraky, M., Marei, H. (2016) A fresh look at Miller's pyramid: assessment at the 'Is' and 'Do' levels. Med Educ. Dec; 50(12), 1253-1257.
Retrieved from: http://www.foundationprogramme.nhs. uk/pages/home/e-portfolio
Retrieved from: http://specialtytraining.hee.nhs.uk.
Supporting evidence for appraisal and revalidation. London: General Medical Council; 2012. Ready for revalidation, 16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal Medical Informatics and Engineering allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without registration
The majority of Medical Informatics and Engineering Open Access journals publish open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The remaining journals offer a choice of licenses.
This journal is available through Creative Commons (CC) License CC-BY 4.0
