COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE, KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY OF THE DOCTOR IN THE PROCESS OF CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. RESERTIFICATION PROBLEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2019.4.11022Keywords:
comprehensive assessment of doctor's knowledge and competences, doctor's portfolio, continuous professional development, recertification, ontology of knowledgeAbstract
Background. The issues of complex assessment of competences, knowledge and skill and peculiarities of metrics during recertification are considered. It is emphasized that there is no single vision of the problem of attestation of doctors. Accordingly, there are problems in changing the country's doctor to ensure that doctors adapt to the advances in knowledge and technology (recertification procedure).
Materials and methods. Results. The purpose of the study is to create a conceptual framework for a quantitative system for evaluating the quality of physicians' advanced training procedures. It is concluded that existing national recertification practices do not ensure the quality of care at the international level, as they assess the competence and effectiveness of physicians only in accordance with national quality standards. There is no single methodology for comprehensive assessment of physician improvement in international recertification systems.
Conclusions. The technique of creation of a multidimensional scale of estimation of continuous professional development of the doctor which can serve as the effective mechanism of a personal portfolio is offered.
References
Wilkinson, T. J., Challis, M., Hobma, S. O. et al. (2002). The use of portfolios for assessment of the competence and performance of doctors in practice. Medical education, 36 (10), 918-924.
Peck, C. et al. (2000). Continuing medical education and continuing professional development: international comparisons. BMJ, 320 (7232), 432-5.
Horsley, T., Grimshaw J., Campbell, C. (2010). Maintaining the competence of Europe's workforce. BMJ, 341. URL: https://www.bmj.com/content/341/ bmj.c4687.full.
Ahmed, K., Wang, T. T., Ashrafian, H. et al. (2013). The effectiveness of continuing medical education for specialist recertification. Can Urol Assoc J, 26672.
Nousiainen, M. T., Caverzagie, K. J., Ferguson, P. C., Frank, J. R. (2017). ICBME Collaborators. Implementing competency-based medical education: What changes in curricular structure and processes are needed, Med Teach,39, 594-8.
Jolly, B., Steinert, Y. (2014). Faculty development for organizational change. In: Faculty Development in the Health Professions. A Focus on Research and Practice. Springer;118.
Gruppen, L., Frank, J. R., Lockyer, J., Ross, Sh. et al. (2017). Toward a research agenda for competency-based medical education. Medical Teacher, 39 (6), 623-30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal Medical Informatics and Engineering allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without registration
The majority of Medical Informatics and Engineering Open Access journals publish open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The remaining journals offer a choice of licenses.
This journal is available through Creative Commons (CC) License CC-BY 4.0
