Peer Review Procedure, Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy
Peer Review Procedure, Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy
The editorial policy of the scientific journal “Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine” is based on international standards of scientific publishing and complies with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics.
The journal ensures a transparent, fair, and ethical manuscript evaluation process that includes initial editorial screening, independent peer review, and editorial decision-making.
The Editorial Board follows the principles of:
- objectivity and impartiality in manuscript evaluation;
- scientific validity of editorial decisions;
- confidentiality of information obtained during the peer review process;
- avoidance of conflicts of interest;
- adherence to the principles of academic integrity.
Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on the basis of their scientific merit, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, nationality, religious beliefs, institutional affiliation, or political views.
Editorial decisions regarding publication are based on:
- the scientific value of the research;
- relevance to the journal’s scope;
- results of independent peer review;
- compliance with ethical standards of scientific publishing.
The editorial office reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the principles of academic integrity or established publication standards.
