IMPACT OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS ON HEALTH CARE: ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2023.3.14225Keywords:
behavioral economics, health care, patients, healthy lifestyle, quality of life, medical serviceAbstract
Purpose: to analyze some key aspects and concepts of behavioral economics that can be applied in healthcare.
Materials and Methods. Data from scientific information sources on the main theories, aspects and concepts of behavioral economics were used for the analysis. The methods of comparative analysis, system approach and system analysis, bibliosemantic method were used.
Results. The paper examines the key principles of behavioral economics and their application in the context of health care. Such concepts as the irrationality of human decisions are revealed and examples are given of how it affects health and how it can be used to achieve better results in medical practice. To achieve this goal, an analysis of the latest research and experiments related to the impact of behavioral economics on health care was carried out, concrete examples were given and the results of these studies were analyzed, directions for further scientific research were proposed, since this area has great potential for development and improvement.
Being scientifically oriented, this work aims to expand the understanding of the impact of behavioral economics on health care and to contribute to the development of more effective strategies in this important field.
In general, research and experiments in the field of behavioral economics in health care show great potential for improving health care and healthy lifestyles in general. Taking into account the psychological and social aspects of decision-making plays a key role in creating more effective programs and interventions in this area.
Conclusions. The application of the principles of behavioral economics in health care opens up endless possibilities for improving the health care system and influencing the behavior of patients and medical workers. This is an important component of the strategy to improve the quality of the provision of medical services and reduce risks to the health of the population.
References
Ariely, D., & Fisher, I. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. HarperCollins.
Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Häubl, G., ... Weber, E.U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Science, 28(3), 396-412.
Chen, M.K., & Riggs, W. (2016). Identity priming and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), 79-87.
Christakis, N.A., & Fowler, J.H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249-2258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
Volpp, K.G., John, L.K., Troxel, A.B., Norton, L., Fassbender, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA, 300(22), 2631-2637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.804
Gallup, L. (2021). The impact of personalized health communication on preventive behaviors. Health Communication, 36(7), 895-906.
Goldstein, D., Cialdini, R., & Grabendine, S. (2016). Social norm messages and their impact on healthy lifestyles. Journal of Health Communication, 41(5), 34-46.
Johnson, E.J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do Defaults Save Lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338-1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721
Kahneman, D., & Tayler, R. (2017). Prospective theory and behaviour analysis: From cognitive decisions to action selection.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R.G. (Eds.). (2005). Social determinants of health. OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198565895.001.0001
Peterson, M., & Smith, D. (2018). Using mobile apps to improve health: practical aspects and opportunities. Mobile Health, 22(3), 67-78.
Tessel, D. (2020). Societal factors and influences on health behaviour: analysis and perspectives. Journal of the Sociology of Health, 25(3), 421-438.
Thaler, R., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), 164-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/380085
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).