ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH THE TECHNIQUES OF X-RAY AND VASCULAR ANGIPLASTY AND OPEN SURGERY OF THE FEMOLOGICAL AND INFRARED SEGMENT FOR ISCHEMIA THAT THREATENS THE LIMBS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2023.2.14041Keywords:
economic efficiency, X-ray angioplasty, bypass surgaryAbstract
Purpose: to compare the cost-effectiveness of various methods of surgical treatment of occlusive-stenotic lesions of the femological and infrared segment for lower extremity with long-term follow-up.
Materials and Methods. In the conducted analysis, including retrospective data in a group with a different survival observation period, economic efficiency coefficients were used, based on the effectiveness of treatment, measured by the annual survival of patients, and the average cost of this procedure in accordance with the decision-making rule in the economic evaluation of medical programs.
Results. Analysis of the cost and effectiveness of surgical treatment patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions femological and infrared segment for limb-threatening ischemia was carried out in 145 observations. Data on the costs of medical workers' wages, material and technical costs, costs of surgical interventions, medications that were used, additional examinations, etc. Were filled retrospectively for the period from 2018 to 2019 inclusive. On the basis of economic efficiency, ratio final results to spent resources, loss of profit for the period of inpatient treatment and loss due to limitation patient's working capacity was calculated.
Conclusions. The method open surgical intervention in limb-threatening ischemia is characterized by a more favorable indicator of economic efficiency, providing similar efficiency, measured by long-term survival, with significantly smaller amounts of payment for performed operation. The difference in payment for the procedure is primarily related to the many times higher cost of consumables for X-ray endovascular intervention. Hybrid procedures are superior to bypass procedures and X-ray endovascular procedures, providing the best results in terms of long-term survival, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness ratio.
References
Golyachenko, O., Gupalo, Yu., Nabolotnyi, O., Kulikovskyi, B., Shamrai-Sas, A., Golyachenko, A., & Kutsyn A. (2021). Ekonomichni pokaznyky khirurhichnoho likuvannya oklyuziyno-stenozuyuchykh urazhen stehnovo-pidkolinnoho sehmenta nyzhnoyi kintsivky u khvorykh iz zahrozlyvoyu ishemiyeyu kintsivky [Economic indicators of surgical treatment of occlusive-stenotic lesions of the femoral-popliteal segment of the lower limb in patients with limb-threatening ischemia]. Klinichna ta profilaktychna medytsyna – Clinical and preventive medicine, 4(18), 51-57. DOI https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.08 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(18).2021.08
Almasri, J., Adusumalli, J., Asi, N., Lakis, S., Alsawas, M., Prokop, L.J., … Murad, M.H. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg., 68(2), 624-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.066
Barshes, N.R., Belkin, M. (2011). A framework for the evaluation of “value” and cost-effectiveness in the management of critical limb ischemia. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 213(4), 552-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.011
Forbes, J.F., Adam, D.J., Bell, J., Fowkes, F.G.R., Gillespie, I., Raab, G.M., … Bradbury, A.W. (2010). Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Vasc. Surg., 51(5 Suppl.), 43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.076
Jones, W.S., Dolor, R.J., Hasselblad, V., Vemulapalli, S., Subherwal, S., Schmit, K., … Patel, M.R. (2014). Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia: systematic review of revascularization in critical limb ischemia. Am. Heart J., 167(4), 489-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.012
Perlander, A., Nordanstig, J., Österberg, K., & Svensson, M. (2022). Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Intervention Versus Bypass Surgery in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Principal Target Lesion in the Femoropopliteal Segment. J. Crit. Limb Ischem., 2(1), E19-E26.
Stoner, M.C., Defreitas, D.J., Manwaring, M.M., Carter, J.J., Parker, F.M., & Powell, C.S. (2008). Cost per day of patency: understanding the impact of patency and reintervention in a sustainable model of healthcare. J. Vasc. Surg., 48(6), 1489-1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.003
Holyachenko, O.A., Kravchenko, A.M., Golyachenko, A.O., Gurianov, V.G., & Karol, I.V. (2022). Femoropopliteal angioplasty vs open surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Wiad.Lek., 75(11pt1), 2585-2588. DOI 10.36740/WLek202211105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202211105
Reinecke, H., Unrath, M., Freisinger, E., Bunzemeier, H., Meyborg, M., Lüders, F., … Malyar, N.M. (2015). Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischaemia: still poor outcomes and lack of guideline adherence. Eur. Heart J., 36(15), 932-938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv006
Duff, S., Mafilios, M.S., Bhounsule, P., & Hasegawa, J.T. (2019). The burden of critical limb ischemia: a review of recent literature. Vasc. Health Risk Manag., 15, 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S209241
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).