S+YNDROMES OF LUMBAR-SACRAL LEVEL AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS DEGREE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2021.2.12379Keywords:
vertebrogenic pain syndromes, life quality, correlationAbstract
Purpose: to identify the relationship between the severity of neurological disorders and life quality in patients with vertebrogenic pain syndromes (VPS) of the lumbosacral level (LSL).
Materials and Methods.. Thirty patients with VPS LSL were studied. The first group included 15 patients with reflex vertebrogenic pain syndromes (RVPS). The second group consisted of 15 patients with discogenic radicular syndromes (DRS). General clinical and vertebrological neurological studies, manual and muscular testing, as well as clinical scales and quality of life questionnaires were used.
Results. The following scales and questionnaires rates were worse in patients with DRS LSL than in patients with RVPS of this level: PainDETECT – 55 (50; 68) and 45 (42; 52), respectively, p < 0,001; 5-point scale of vertebral and neurological deficit (5-PSVND) – 8 (8; 10) and 5 (4; 7), respectively, p < 0.001; IMS – 10 (9; 13) and 8 (6; 8), respectively, p < 0,013; pain intensity scale by I. P. Antonov – 3 (2; 3) and 2 (2; 3), respectively, p < 0,029; Osvestri 2.1 – 15 (14; 17) and 10 (9; 14), respectively, p < 0.002; VAS – 5 (5; 7) against 3 (3; 5), respectively, p < 0,008; HADS (anxiety domain) – 8 (6; 10) and 5 (4; 7), respectively, HADS (depression domain) – 6 (4; 8) and 3 (2; 4), respectively, p < 0,045.
There was a strong positive correlation between the Oswestry scale 2.1 rates and VAS (r = 0.709, p <0.003) were observed, as well as the medium positive correlation between the indicators on the Oswestry scale and IMS (r = 0.629, p < 0.012).
Conclusions. Neurological disorders and life quality indicators were worse in patients with DRS LSL than in patients with RVPS LSL. There was stronger correlation between clinical data and life quality rates in patients with DRS LSL than in patients with RVPS LSL.
References
Chou, R. (2014). In the clinic. Low back pain. Ann Intern. Med., 160 (11), 6-1.
Martin, B.I., Deyo, R.A., & Mirza, S.K. (2008). Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA, 299, 656-664.
Juniper, M., Le, T.K., & Mladsi, D. (2009). The epidemiology, economic burden, and pharmacological treatment of chronic low back pain in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK: a literature-based review. Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 10, 2581-2592.
Stewart, W.F., Ricci, J.A., Chee, E., Morganstein, D., & Lipton R. (2003). Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA, 290, 2443-2454.
Maniadakis, N., & Gray A. (2000). The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain, 8495, 103.
Sambamoorthi, U., Tan, X., & Deb, A. (2015). Multiple chronic conditions and healthcare costs among adults. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 15, 823-832.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).