THE TOOLKIT FOR STUDYING THE VIEW OF DERMATOVENEREOLOGICAL SPECIALISTS ON THEIR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF HEALTHCARE REFORM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2020.3.11627Keywords:
organization of medical care, dermatovenereological profile, personnel, tools, sociological research, professional development, working conditions, resource provision, COVID-19, reformAbstract
Purpose: identification of prospective directions for improving medical care for the population and substantiation of tools for studying the view of dermatovenereological specialists on their professional activities in the context of healthcare reform.
Materials and Methods. The bibliographic, medical-statistical, information-analytical methods are used. The sources used were scientific literature data, strategies and programs of WHO, WHO/Europe, regulating the organization of health services delivery and ensuring their quality; data of the Center for Medical Statistics of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine.
Results. The medical and social research identified modern problems and strategic directions for improving healthcare services for the population in relation to the overall health services coverage, taking into account the challenges and threats, contemporary demographic, epidemiological contexts, etc.
Trends in the incidence and prevalence of diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue among the population of Ukraine, changes in the provision of the population with dermatovenerological specialists in the period 2000–2017 were revealed.
The toolkit has been substantiated for studying the opinions of dermatovenereologists on professional activities in the context of healthcare reform, including demographic, economic, medical, industrial, resource, educational, informational questions, as well as those about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on working conditions and the results of the work, about the existing problems and needs.
Conclusions. Conducting a sociological study among dermatovenereological professionals using the proposed tools will contribute to clarify the problematic issues of their professional activities in the context of healthcare reform, vision of development prospects, and will justify the directions and measures to improve the organization of the provision of dermatovenerological care.
References
Busse, R., Klazinga, N., Panteli, D., & Quentin, W. (2019). Improving healthcare quality in Europe Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies.
(2018). European health report 2018. More than numbers – evidence for all. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark.
(2013). Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark.
(2016). Frequently asked questions (FAQ). Тhe European Framework for Action on Organizing integrated health care delivery. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030 / DRAFT 1.0 submitted to the Executive Board (138th Session). Health workforce department World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
(2020). Health system considerations: when influenza meets COVID-19 Preparedness and response measures whenCOVID-19, influenza and acute respiratory infectionscoincide in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2013). Implementing a Health 2020 vision: governance for health in the 21st century. Making it happen. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2020). Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context. Interim guidance 1 June 2020. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2009). Ellen Nolte and Martin McKee. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.
(2020). Strengthening and adjusting public health measures throughout the COVID-19 transition phases Policy considerations for the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2020). Strengthening the health systems response to COVID-19. Adapting primary health care services to more effectively address COVID-19 (17 June 2020). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
(2020). Strengthening the health system response to covid-19. Preventing and managing the COVID-19 pandemic across long-term care services in the WHO European Region (21 May 2020). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Strengthened the health systems save more lives. An insight into WHO’s European Health Systems’ Strategy. Retrieved from: http://www.euro.who.int/ __data/assets/pdf_file/0011/78914/healthsys_savelives.pdf.
(2018). The toolkit for a sustainable health workforce in the WHO European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen.
(2015). Tracking universal health coverage: First global monitoring report. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
(2017). WHO priorities for action towards a Decade of Action on Healthy Ageing(2021-2030). Geneva: WHO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).