ENDOMETRIOSIS: ACHIEVEMENTS AND ISSUES IN WORLD RESEARCH

Authors

  • S. V. Khmil I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • I. Ya. Pidhaina Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • I. I. Kulyk Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • N. D. Koblosh O. Lukianova Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2019.4.10953

Keywords:

endometriosis treatment, infertility

Abstract

Purpose: to investigate the problem of endometriosis in modern scientific literature.

Materials and Methods. 38 scientific literature sources were analyzed, 30 of which were foreign. For this, the bibliosemantic method was used.

Results. The true incidence of endometriosis is difficult to determine, since a definitive diagnosis is made only by laparoscopy or laparotomy with histological findings. Undoubtedly, it is impossible to eliminate the anatomical substrate of endometriosis by any method other than surgery. Conservative treatment reduces the symptoms of the disease and improves the function of the reproductive system over a period of time. However, even surgical treatment is not always appropriate as it carries the risk of relapse. In most cases, it adversely affects the status of the ovarian reserve, impairing the quality of ovogenesis. For today, the main task for scientists is still to find application points between pathogenesis links and possible targeted therapy that would be optimal for the patient in the absence of side effects, the absence of disease relapse and the possibility of obtaining the desired pregnancy.

Conclusions. Statistical data, theories of pathogenesis of endometriosis, methods of diagnostics and analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of treatment of endometriosis are presented. Undoubtedly, despite the vast amount of literature available today, there is no single protocol, International Guideline, which outlines single algorithm for endometriosis diagnosis and treatment. Experts emphasize only an individual approach with a comprehensive solution to the problem of woman’s age, localization and extent of the process, the severity of symptoms, fertility status and the need to restore reproductive function, the presence of concomitant gynecological and somatic pathology, the effectiveness of previously conducted treatment. In the modern domestic and foreign literature, endometriosis remains a debatable issue and requires new approaches to study and solve this problem.

Author Biographies

S. V. Khmil, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine

DM (Medicine), Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology # 1 of I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

I. Ya. Pidhaina, Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine

obstetrician-gynecologist at Ternopil Perinatal Center «Mather and Child»

I. I. Kulyk, Medical Center “Clinic of Professor S. Khmil”, Ternopil, Ukraine

obstetrician-gynecologist at the Medical Center "Professor S. Khmil's Clinic"

N. D. Koblosh, O. Lukianova Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD (Medicine), Head of women's counseling of 3O. Lukianova Institute of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine

References

Korchynska, O.O., Mashtepa, A.M., Voloshyna, U.V., & Petrenko, T.H. (2015). Endometrioz yak odna iz suchasnykh problem u hinekolohii ta akusherstvi [Endometriosis as one of the contemporary problems in gynecology and obstetrics]. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii – Ukraine. The Nation's Health, 2 (34), 204-215 [in Ukrainian].

Zhulkevych, I.V., & Kryvokulskyi, B.D. (2018). Personalizatsiia v onkolohii: indyvidualnyi pidkhid do profilaktyky tromboembolichnykh uskladnen pry panhisterektomii [Personalization in oncology: individual approach to the prevention of thromboembolic complications during hysterectomy]. Visnyk sotsialnoi hihiieny ta orhanizatsii okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy – Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine, 4, 11-18 [in Ukrainian].

Zhulkevych, I.V. (2001). Faktory vplyvu na rekonstruktyvni protsesy kistkovoi tkanyny v zhinok iz zalizodefitsytnoiu anemiieiu [Factors of influence on the reconstructive processes of bone tissue in women with iron deficiency anemia]. Shpytalna khirurhiia – Hospital Surgery, 3, 122-126 [in Ukrainian].

Zakharenko, O.S., Yuzko, O.M., & Zakharenko, L.V. (2013). Henitalnyi endometrioz yak prychyna zhinochoho bezpliddia [Genital endometriosis as a cause of female infertility]. Neonatolohiia, khirurhiia ta perynatalna medytsyna – Neonatology, Surgery and Perinatal Medicine, 3, 1, 76-89 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24061/2413-4260.III.1.7.2013.11

Kulakov, V.I., Adamyan, L.V., & Volobuyev, A.I. (2003). Magnitnorezonansnaya tomografiya v diagnostike razlichnykh form endometrioza [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of various forms of endometriosis]. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii – Bulletin of Rontgenology and Radiology, 4, 45-59 [in Russian].

Medvediev, M.V., & Pokrovenko, D.A. (2019). Suchasnyi pohliad na etiolohiiu, patohenez ta mozhlyvosti diahnostyky zovnishnoho henitalnoho endometriozu (ohliad literatury) [Modern look at the etiology, pathogenesis and possibilities of diagnostics of external genital endometriosis (literature review)]. Medychni perspektyvy – Medical Perspectives, 24, 1, 21-30 [in Ukrainian].

Chervak, N.M. (2014). Endometrioz: stan problemy [Endometriosis: the state of the problem]. Meditsinskiye aspekty zdorovya zhenshchiny – Medical Aspects of Women’s Health, 8 (83) [in Ukrainian].

Kang, Y.J., Jeung, I.C., Park, A., Park, Y.J., Jung, H., Kim, T.D., …, & Yoon, S.R. (2014). An increased level of IL-6 suppresses NK cell activity in peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis via regulation of SHP-2 expression. Human Reproduction, 29, 2176-2189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu172

Fassbender, A., Vodolazkaia, A., Saunders, P., Lebovic, D., Waelkens, E., De Moor, B., & D’Hooghe, T. (2013). Biomarkers of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 4, 1135-1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.097

Check, J.H. (2009). CA-125 as a biomarker for malignant transformation of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 5, article e36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.036

Rogers, P.A., D’Hooghe, T.M., Fazleabas, A., Giudice, L.C., Montgomery, G.W., Petraglia, F., & Taylor, R.N. (2013). Defining Future Directions for Endometriosis Research: Workshop Report From the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Montpellier, France Reproductive Sciences, 20 (5), 483-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113477495

Dendritic cells attenuate the early establishment of endometriosis-like lesions in a murine model / A. K. Stanic, M. Kim, A. K. Styer, B. R. Rueda // Reproductive Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 21. – P. 1228–1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114525267

Fainaru, O., Adini, A., Benny, O., Adini, I., Short, S., Bazinet, L., …, & Folkman, J. (2008). Dendritic cells support angiogenesis and promote lesion growth in a murine model of endometriosis. The FASEB Journal, 22, 2, 522-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9034com

Mehedintu, C., Plotogea, M.N., Ionescu, S., & Antonovici, M. (2014). Endometriosis still a challenge. Journal of Medicine and Life, 7, 3, 349-357.

Reis, F.M., Petraglia, F., & Taylor, R.N. (2013). Endometriosis: hormone regulation and clinical consequences of chemotaxis and apoptosis. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 4, 406-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt010

Vodolazkaia, A., El-Aalamat, Y., Popovic, D., Mihalyi, A., Bossuyt, X., Kyama, C.M., …, & D’Hooghe, T.M. (2012). Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 27, 9, 2698-2711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des234

Hsu, A.L., Khachikyan, I., & Stratton, P. (2010). Invasive and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 53 (2), 413-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181db7ce8

Gajbhiye, R., Sonawani, A., Khan, S., Suryawanshi, A., Kadam, S., Warty, N., …, & Khole, V. (2012). Identification and validation of novel serum markers for early diagnosis of endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 27, 2, 408-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der410

Nabeta, M., Abe, Y., Takaoka, Y., Kusanagi, Y., & Ito, M. (2011). Identification of anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibody as a novel serum marker of endometriosis. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 91, 1-2, 48-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2011.04.012

Kwak, J.Y., Park, S.W., Kim, K.H., Na, Y.J., & Lee, K.S. (2002). Modulation of neutrophil apoptosis by plasma and peritoneal fluid from patients with advanced endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 17, 3, 595-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.3.595

Gorban, N.Y., Zadorozhna, T.D., Vovk, I.B., & Zhulkevych, I.V. (2019). Morphological features of uterine polyps in females of reproductive age. Visnyk naukovykh doslidzhen – Bulletin of Scientific Research, 2, 47-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/2415-8798.2019.2.10267

Bedaiwy, M.A., Alfaraj, S., Yong, P., & Casper, R. (2017). New developments in the medical treatment of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 107, 3, 555-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.025

Mabrouk, M., Elmakky, A., Caramelli, E., Farina, A., Mignemi, G., Venturoli, S., …, & Seracchioli, R. (2012). Performance of peripheral (serum and molecular) blood markers for diagnosis of endometriosis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 285, 5, 1307-1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2122-4

May, K.E., Conduit-Hulbert, S.A., Villar, J., Kirtley, S., Kennedy, S.H., & Becker, C.M. (2010). Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 16, 6, 651-674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq009

Soares, S.R., Martínez-Varea, A., Hidalgo-Mora, J.J., & Pellicer, A. (2012). Pharmacologic therapies in endometriosis: a systematic review. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 3, 529-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1120

Prediction of pelvic pathology in subfertile women with combined Chlamydia antibody and CA-125 tests / J. Penninx, M. Brandes, J. P. de Bruin [et al.] // European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. – 2009. – Vol. 147, No. 2. – P. 178–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.004

Ramos, I.M., Podgaec, S., Abrão, M.S., Oliveira, R.D., & Baracat, E.C. (2012). Evaluation of CA-125 and soluble CD-23 in patients with pelvic endometriosis: a case-control study. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 58, 1, 26-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0104-4230(12)70151-3

Becker, C.M., Gattrell, W.T., Gude, K., & Singh, S.S. (2017). Reevaluating response and failure of medical treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Fertility and Sterility, 108, 1, 125-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.004

Navarro, V.M., Gottsch, M.L., & Chavkin, C. (2009). Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion by kisspeptin/dynorphin/neurokinin B neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the mouse. J. Neurosci., 29, 11859-11866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-09.2009

Rizner, T.L. (2014). Noninvasive biomarkers of endometriosis: myth or reality? Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 14, 3, 365-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2014.899905

Nabeta, M., Abe, Y., Haraguchi, R., Kito, K., Kusanagi, Y., & Ito, M. (2010). Serum anti-PDIK1L autoantibody as a novel marker for endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 7, 2552-2557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.008

Somigliana, E., & Garcia-Velasco, J.A. (2015). Treatment of infertility associated with deep endometriosis: definition of therapeutic balances. Fertility and Sterility, 104, 4, 764-770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.003

Sourial, S., & Tempest, N., & Hapangama, D.K. (2014). Theories on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179515

Tanbo, T., & Fedorcsak, P. (2017). Endometriosis-associated infertility: aspects of pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment options. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96, 659-667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13082

Culley, L., Law, C., Hudson, N., Denny, E., Mitchell, H., Baumgarten, M., & Raine-Fenning, N. (2013). The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 6, 625-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt027

Socolov, R., Butureanu, S., Angioni, S., Sindilar, A., Boiculese, L., Cozma, L., & Socolov, D. (2011). The value of serological markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of endometriosis: a prospective case-control study. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 154, 2, 215-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.008

Tokmak, A., Ugur, M., Tonguc, E., Var, T., Moraloglu, O., & Ozaksit, G. (2011). The value of urocortin and Ca-125 in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 283, 5, 1075-1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1505-2

Fassbender, A., Burney, R.O., O, D.F., D’Hooghe, T., & Giudice, L. (2015). Update on biomarkers for the detection of Endometriosis. Biomed. Res. Int., 130854. doi: 10.1155/2015/130854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/130854

Published

2020-03-17

How to Cite

Khmil, S. V., Pidhaina, I. Y., Kulyk, I. I., & Koblosh, N. D. (2020). ENDOMETRIOSIS: ACHIEVEMENTS AND ISSUES IN WORLD RESEARCH. Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine, (4), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2019.4.10953

Issue

Section

The review of the scientific literature