PUBLIC HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2019.2.10477Keywords:
behavioral economy, behavioral responses, public healthAbstract
Purpose: to highlight the basic principles of behavioral economics, in particular, the incentive factors, the importance of information, its context and presentation, social factors that cause certain behavior in people and coverage of the results of their implementation in practical medicine.
Materials and Methods. The structure of the study analysis included: a description of the primary information, identification of factors and patterns, a summary of the findings in the study findings, and the development of prospects for further research based on the findings.
Results. Behavioral economics proves that people are not fully rational and predictable in their behavior, particularly in health issues, as standard economic theory suggests. The vast majority of people in society are “behavioral,” meaning that they may suffer from biases that complicate the attainment of one or the other behavior that may be preferred. Regardless of whether the person is rational or prone to behavioral bias, there are certain factors that influence the optimal decision making and lead to deliberate failure to follow certain medical recommendations, refusal of vaccination, malnutrition, etc. Accordingly, this requires additional intervention on the minds of people who are not always able to comprehensively assess future benefits, overcoming the current discomfort. Identifying and understanding these factors can successfully influence people’s behavior and health decisions.
Conclusions. In order to achieve positive outcomes in public health, principles based on behavioral responses must be studied, considered and applied. The introduction of behavioral economics principles into the healthcare industry will help encourage patients to lead healthy lifestyles with systematic adherence to medical guidelines.
References
Smeyanov, V.A., Smeyanova, O.I., Tarasenko, S.V., & Demikhova, N.V. (2014). Otsenka effektivnosti vnedreniya mekhanizma vnutrennego audita kachestva meditsinskoy pomoshchi bolnym arterialnoy gipertenziyey [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the internal audit mechanism of the quality of medical care for patients with arterial hypertension]. Azerbaijan Medical Journal, 3, 62-65
Acland, D., & Levy, M. (2011). Habit Formation, Naivete, and Projection Bias in Gym Attendance. Unpublished manuscript.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Incentives to exercise. Econometrica, 77 (3), 909-931.
Eisenberg, M.E., & Forster, J.L. (2003). Adolescent smoking behavior: measures of social norms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25 (2), 122-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00116-8
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 791-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554917
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/468061
Johnson, E.J., & Goldstein, D.G. (2004). Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation, 78, 1713-1716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000149788.10382.B2
Lacetera, N., & Macis, M. (2010). Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76 (2), 225-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.08.007
Lacetera, N., Macis, M., & Slonim, R. (2012). Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4 (1), 186–-223.
Lacetera, N., Macis, M., & Slonim, R. (2013). Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science, 340 (6135), 927-928.
Long, J.A., Helweg-Larsen, M., & Volpp, K.G. (2008). Patient opinions regarding‘pay for performance for patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23 (10), 1647-1652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0739-1
Perkins, H.W., Haines, M.P., & Rice, R. (2005). Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66 (4), 470-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470
Titmuss, R.M. (1971). Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).