PUBLIC HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMY

Authors

  • V. A. Smiyanov Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
  • V. O. Kurganskaya Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
  • O. I. Smiyanova Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
  • N. O. Dryga Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2019.2.10477

Keywords:

behavioral economy, behavioral responses, public health

Abstract

Purpose: to highlight the basic principles of behavioral economics, in particular, the incentive factors, the importance of information, its context and presentation, social factors that cause certain behavior in people and coverage of the results of their implementation in practical medicine.

Materials and Methods. The structure of the study analysis included: a description of the primary information, identification of factors and patterns, a summary of the findings in the study findings, and the development of prospects for further research based on the findings.

Results. Behavioral economics proves that people are not fully rational and predictable in their behavior, particularly in health issues, as standard economic theory suggests. The vast majority of people in society are “behavioral,” meaning that they may suffer from biases that complicate the attainment of one or the other behavior that may be preferred. Regardless of whether the person is rational or prone to behavioral bias, there are certain factors that influence the optimal decision making and lead to deliberate failure to follow certain medical recommendations, refusal of vaccination, malnutrition, etc. Accordingly, this requires additional intervention on the minds of people who are not always able to comprehensively assess future benefits, overcoming the current discomfort. Identifying and understanding these factors can successfully influence people’s behavior and health decisions.

Conclusions. In order to achieve positive outcomes in public health, principles based on behavioral responses must be studied, considered and applied. The introduction of behavioral economics principles into the healthcare industry will help encourage patients to lead healthy lifestyles with systematic adherence to medical guidelines.

Author Biographies

V. A. Smiyanov, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Public Health Department of Sumy State University Medical Institute

V. O. Kurganskaya, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Sumy State University Medical Institute

O. I. Smiyanova, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

Senior Lecturer in Public Health, Sumy State University Medical Institute

N. O. Dryga, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

graduate student at the Department of Public Health of Sumy State University Medical Institute

References

Smeyanov, V.A., Smeyanova, O.I., Tarasenko, S.V., & Demikhova, N.V. (2014). Otsenka effektivnosti vnedreniya mekhanizma vnutrennego audita kachestva meditsinskoy pomoshchi bolnym arterialnoy gipertenziyey [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of the internal audit mechanism of the quality of medical care for patients with arterial hypertension]. Azerbaijan Medical Journal, 3, 62-65

Acland, D., & Levy, M. (2011). Habit Formation, Naivete, and Projection Bias in Gym Attendance. Unpublished manuscript.

Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Incentives to exercise. Econometrica, 77 (3), 909-931.

Eisenberg, M.E., & Forster, J.L. (2003). Adolescent smoking behavior: measures of social norms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25 (2), 122-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00116-8

Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 791-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554917

Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/468061

Johnson, E.J., & Goldstein, D.G. (2004). Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation, 78, 1713-1716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000149788.10382.B2

Lacetera, N., & Macis, M. (2010). Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76 (2), 225-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.08.007

Lacetera, N., Macis, M., & Slonim, R. (2012). Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4 (1), 186–-223.

Lacetera, N., Macis, M., & Slonim, R. (2013). Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science, 340 (6135), 927-928.

Long, J.A., Helweg-Larsen, M., & Volpp, K.G. (2008). Patient opinions regarding‘pay for performance for patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23 (10), 1647-1652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0739-1

Perkins, H.W., Haines, M.P., & Rice, R. (2005). Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66 (4), 470-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470

Titmuss, R.M. (1971). Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon

Published

2019-10-17

How to Cite

Smiyanov, V. A., Kurganskaya, V. O., Smiyanova, O. I., & Dryga, N. O. (2019). PUBLIC HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMY. Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine, (2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2786.2019.2.10477

Issue

Section

Organization of medical care