EVALUATION OF THE ATTITUDE OF MEDICAL UNIVERSITY TEACHERS TOWARDS THE NEED FOR STUDENTS TO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF GLAUCOMA
Keywords:
ophthalmology; glaucoma; education; medical university teachers; mechanisms of knowledge acquisition; guidelines.Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the opinion of medical university teachers regarding the need for medical students to study glaucoma and the possibility of future ophthalmologists to obtain knowledge of glaucoma diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Materials and Methods. Survey data study using a questionnaire developed by us for teachers of four medical universities of Ukraine. The work used bibliographic, statistical and analytical methods. Results. When asked about the need for future doctors of various specialties to have knowledge of mod- ern approaches to organizing preventive work to prevent the development of glaucoma, the basics and modern approaches of treatment of glaucoma, the need for knowledge of modern approaches to prevent complications of glaucoma and prevent its progression, and modern approaches to identifying factors that contribute to the develop- ment of glaucoma, more than 75% of the surveyed teachers answered affirmatively. However, only 57% of those surveyed answered affirmatively that the amount of information provided to future family doctors is sufficient for this. Among the mechanisms for future ophthalmologists to gain competence in the organization of ophthalmological care and prevention of open-angle glaucoma, the teachers noted the importance of use of medical care standards and local clinical protocols (94% and 95%, respectively). However, more than 22% of respondents answered that clinical protocols for managing patients with glaucoma were not included in curricula of future ophthalmologists. More than 45% of surveyed medical did not teach future ophthalmologists the Order of the Ministry of Health No. 939 “Glaucoma” and the Guideline of the European Glaucoma Society. Conclusions. Despite the fact that the majority of the surveyed teachers believed that knowledge of glaucoma treatment and prevention was important for future doctors, only half of the respondents considered the amount of information provided in the educational program sufficient for medical students to obtain the necessary knowledge about modern approaches to the organization of ophthalmological care and prevention of glaucoma. There is a dis- crepancy between the importance of studying protocols and standards for the provision of medical and preventive care, and the real indicator of students’ study of modern domestic and European orders and protocols.
References
Burton M. J., Ramke J., Marques A. P., Bourne R. R. A., Congdon N., Jones I., Ah Tong B. A. M., Arunga S., Bachani D., Bascaran C., Bastawrous A., Blanchet K., Braithwaite T., Buchan J. C., Cairns J., Cama A., Chagunda M., Chuluunkhuu C., Cooper A., Crofts-Lawrence J., … Faal H. B. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. The Lancet. Global health. 2021. Vol. 9 (4). Р. 489–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5.
BouGhanem G. O., Wareham L. K., & Calkins D. J. Addressing neurodegeneration in glaucoma: Mechanisms, challenges, and treatments. Progress in retinal and eye research, 2024. Vol. 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pretey-eres.2024.101261.
Shan S., Wu J., Cao J., Feng Y., Zhou J., Luo Z., Song P., Rudan I., & Global Health Epidemiology Research Group (GHERG). Global incidence and risk factors for glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of global health. 2024. Vol. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04252.
Saini D. J. B., Choubey S., Choubey A., Kidwai M., Mehrotra M., Kolekar S., & Raut Y. Early detection of glaucoma integrated with deep learning models over medical devices. BioSystems. 2024. Vol. 238. DOI: //doi.org/10.1016/j.bio-systems.2024.105156.
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, & Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. Global health. 2021. Vol. 9 (2). Р. 130–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3. PMCID: PMC7820390.
Imrie C., &Tatham A. J. Glaucoma: the patient’s perspective. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. Vol. 66 (646). Р. 371–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685165.
Leung D. Y. L., & Tham C. C. Normal-tension glaucoma: Current concepts and approaches-A review. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2022. Vol. 50 (2). Р. 247–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14043.
Pelčić, G., Ljubičić, R., Barać, J., Biuk, D., & Rogoić, V. Glaucoma, depression and quality of life: multiple comorbidities, multiple assessments and multidisciplinary plan treatment. PsychiatriaDanubina. 2017. Vol. 29 (3). Р. 351–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2017.351.
Quaranta L., Novella A., Tettamanti M., Pasina L., Weinreb R. N., & Nobili A. Adherence and Persistence to Medical Therapy in Glaucoma: An Overview. Ophthalmology and therapy. 2023. Vol. 12 (5). Р. 2227–2240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00730-zLi.
Zhang R. K., Lu Z., Mou D., Wang J., Li H., Fan S., Wang N., Liu H. Cost-utility analysis of commonly used anti-glaucoma interventions for mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma patients in rural and urban China. BMJ Open. Sep 6, 2023. Vol. 13 (9). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219. PMID: 37673456; PMCID: PMC10496665.
Stein J. D., Khawaja A. P., & Weizer J. S. Glaucoma in Adults-Screening, Diagnosis, and Management: A Review. JAMA. 2021. Vol. 325 (2). Р. 164–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.21899.
Soqia J., Ataya J., Alhalabi R., Alhomsi R., Hamwy R., Mardini K., & Hamzeh A. Awareness and knowledge of glaucoma among visitors of main public hospitals in Damascus, Syria: a cross-sectional study. BMC ophthalmology. 2023. Vol. 23 (1). Р. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02766-4.
Глаукома, клінічна настанова, заснована на доказах. 2023.
European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2021. Vol. 105 (Suppl 1). Р. 1–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
Про затвердження Стандарту медичної допомоги «Глаукома» : наказ МОЗ України від 26.05.2023 № 959. 16. Jan C., He M., Vingrys A., Zhu Z., & Stafford R. S. Diagnosing glaucoma in primary eye care and the role of Artificial Intelligence applications for reducing the prevalence of undetected glaucoma in Australia. Eye (London, England). 2024. Vol. 38 (11). Р. 2003–2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03026-z.
Alwazae M., Almutairi A., Alhumud A., Alhumidan A., Alqahtani A. A., & Nisar S. Awareness About Glaucoma Management Among Physicians in Riyadh: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2020. Vol. 12 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8450.
Hasan M. M., Phu J., Sowmya A., Meijering E., & Kalloniatis M. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of glaucoma and neurodegenerative diseases. Clinical & experimental optometry. 2024. Vol. 107 (2). Р. 130–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2023.2235346.
Bhaumik S. Use of evidence for clinical practice guideline development. Tropical parasitology. 2017. Vol. 7 (2). Р. 65–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/tp.TP_6_17.
Dutt D. D. C. S., Carr S. E., Scott T. M., Petsoglou C., Grigg J., & Razavi H. Educators’ consideration of learner motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school: Influences on teaching practice and course design. Medical teacher. 2024. Vol. 46 (3). Р. 387–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2256956.
Vucinovic A., Bukic J., Rusic D., Leskur D., Perisin A. S., Cohadzic T., Luksic M., & Modun D. Investigation of Biomedical Students’ Knowledge on Glaucoma Reveals a Need for Education: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2022. Vol. 10 (7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071241.
Chan T. Y., Rai A. S., Lee E., Glicksman J. T., & Hutnik C. M. Needs assessment of ophthalmology education for primary care physicians in training: comparison with the International Council of Ophthalmology recommendations. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2011. Vol. 5. Р. 311–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S17567.
Succar T., Grigg J., Beaver H. A., & Lee A. G. Advancing ophthalmology medical student education: International insights and strategies for enhanced teaching. Survey of ophthalmology. 2020. Vol. 65 (2). Р. 263–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.08.006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).