COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING METHODS FOR MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS IN UKRAINE REGARDING ANAPHYLAXIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61751/ijmmr/1.2024.40

Keywords:

anaphylaxis, knowledge, physicians, adrenaline, training

Abstract

The incidence of аnaphylaxis is increasing worldwide. Therefore, it is crucial for medical practitioners to be aware of anaphylaxis symptoms and respond effectively. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of Ukrainian doctors’ knowledge regarding anaphylaxis, ability to recognise variable presentations of anaphylaxis, and knowledge of adrenaline administration depending on their form of training. A cross-sectional study was conducted between May 2023 and June 2023, involving physicians from different specialities, medical paramedics, medical students, and interns in Ukraine. A standardised anonymous questionnaire based on the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for anaphylaxis (2021 update) was used to evaluate knowledge of clinical criteria for diagnosing and managing anaphylaxis. The study compared two groups: one with completed European Resuscitation Council courses in simulation centres (Group 1) and the other without such practical reinforcement (Group 2). Respondents primarily acquired knowledge about anaphylaxis during university studies and from Ukrainian guidelines, with only a minority referring to international guidelines. Approximately half of the participants completed European Resuscitation Council courses in simulation centres, suggesting the potential positive impact of practical reinforcement of theoretical knowledge. Group 1 demonstrated a higher percentage of recognising anaphylaxis in scenarios that combined symptoms of the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems without involving mucosal tissue and skin manifestations after exposure to a potential allergen, and they also provided more accurate responses regarding the route of adrenaline administration. Nonetheless, there was also a tendency for overdiagnosis by respondents in Group 1. The study revealed differences in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis among medical practitioners, with an advantage for those who completed European Resuscitation Council courses. Continuous education and simulation-based training are crucial for reducing anaphylaxis mortality and improving treatment outcomes

Received: 07.02.2024 | Revised: 03.05.2024 | Accepted: 28.05.2024

Author Biographies

Alina Pokryshko, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine

Assistant Professor 46001, 1 Maidan Voli, Ternopil, Ukraine

 

Olha Dutchak, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine

PhD in Medical Sciences, Assistant Professor 46001, 1 Maidan Voli, Ternopil, Ukraine

References

Turner PJ, Campbell DE, Motosue MS, Campbell RL. Global trends in anaphylaxis epidemiology and clinical implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1169–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027

Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Fernandez Rivas M, Fineman S, et al. World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(10):100472. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472

Arga M, Topal E, Yılmaz S, Erdemli PC, Bıçakcı K, Bakırtaş A. Healthcare workers' knowledge level regarding anaphylaxis and usage of epinephrine auto-injectors. Turk J Pediatr. 2021;63:372–83. DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2021.03.004

Cuevas M, Frank M, Haacke W, Lüdke T. Prehospital care of anaphylactic reactions by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden: An analysis of treatment and outcome. HNO. 2024;1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-024-01457-4

Shaker MS, Wallace DV, Golden DBK, Oppenheimer J, Bernstein JA, Campbell RL, et al. Anaphylaxis – a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(4):1082–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.017

Paes P, Leat D, Stewart J. Complex decision making in medical training: Key internal and external influences in developing practical wisdom. Med Educ. 2019;53(2):165–74. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13767

Sipahi Cimen S, Sayili SB. Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis. Asia Pac Allergy. 2022;12(4):e41. DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41

Alsaleem HN, Almuzaini AS, Aldakheel FN, Almuhaisni R, Alsharekh NA, Alharkan MK, et al. Knowledge and preparedness of physicians in relation to anaphylaxis at primary healthcare centers in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e57153. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57153

Muraro A, Worm M, Alviani C, Cardona V, DunnGalvin A, Garvey LH, et al. EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update). Allergy. 2022;77(2):357–77. DOI: 10.1111/all.15032

The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/ declaration-of-helsinki/

Patel N, Chong KW, Yip AYG, Ierodiakonou D, Bartra J, Boyle RJ, et al. Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(5):1307–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042

González-Díaz SN, Villarreal-González RV, Fuentes-Lara EI, Salinas-Díaz MDR, de Lira-Quezada CE, Macouzet-Sánchez C, et al. Knowledge of healthcare providers in the management of anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J. 2021;14(11):100599. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100599

Jares EJ, Cardona V, Gómez RM, Bernstein JA, Rosario Filho NA, Cherrez-Ojeda I, et al. Latin American anaphylaxis registry. World Allergy Organ J. 2023;16(2):100748. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100748

Almarri D, Badghaish F, Albaiji D, Alamri A, Alghamdi R, Alkhadra F, et al. Level of awareness of certified non-critical care physicians in diagnosing, managing, and disposing of anaphylactic cases. Med Arch. 2024;78(1):44–50. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.44-50

El-Sayed ZA, El-Owaidy R, Hussein SM, Hossam D, El-Sawi IH, Adel A, et al. Physicians' knowledge and practice concerning diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis: The situation in Egypt. Afr J Emerg Med. 2021;11(4):464–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.07.005

Serbes M, Nemmezi Karaca S. Preparedness and knowledge level of family physicians regarding anaphylaxis diagnosis and management. Balıkesir Health Sci J. 2023;12(1):66–73. DOI: 10.53424/balikesirsbd.1244214

Alen Coutinho I, Ferreira D, Regateiro FS, Pita J, Ferreira M, Martins JF, et al. Anaphylaxis in an emergency department: a retrospective 10-year study in a tertiary hospital. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;52(1):23–34. DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.98

Alghasham YA, Alhumaidi KA, Alharbi AM, Alkhalifah YS. Healthcare providers' perception and practice toward anaphylaxis in children in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41366. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41366

Pimentel-Hayashi JA, Navarrete-Rodriguez EM, Moreno-Laflor OI, Del Rio-Navarro BE. Physicians' knowledge regarding epinephrine underuse in anaphylaxis. Asia Pac Allergy. 2020;10(4):e40. DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e40

Sicherer SH, Simons FER; SECTION ON ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY. Epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis. Pediatrics. 2017;139(3):e20164006. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-4006

George T, Carey RAB, Abraham OC, Sebastian T, Faith MF. Trainee doctors in medicine prefer case-based learning compared to didactic teaching. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(2):580–84. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1093_19

Kaya SB, Alaylar Y. What do doctors know about anaphylaxis? Asthma Allergy Immunol. 2024;22:1–7. DOI: 10.21911/aai.2024.094

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

Pokryshko, A., & Dutchak, O. (2024). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING METHODS FOR MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS IN UKRAINE REGARDING ANAPHYLAXIS. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, 10(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.61751/ijmmr/1.2024.40