• P. P. Hanynets Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education
  • N. O. Sinyenko Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education
Keywords: quality of medical care, quantitative assessments of medical care, industrial assessments of the quality of medical care, risk of adverse outcome, public-private partnership, Pareto efficiency theory, Taguchi loss function, risk management in the practice of a medical institution


Background. The issues of application of some industrial assessments for the quantitative determination of the quality of care for patients at the rehabilitation stage of treatment are considered.

Results. At the same time, these assessments were compared in the structures of public and private sectors. It is emphasized that if the financial and administrative issues of such interaction have been studied to a certain extent, then a quantitative assessment of the quality of medical care in a public-private partnership (PPP) still raises questions. They are especially evident in the analysis of the effectiveness of cooperation in the rehabilitation of patients. The aspects of using the Pareto efficiency theory application and the Taguchi loss function are considered. The theoretical approaches to the use of scientific and technological tools for the implementation of PPPs in medical institutions, in particular in a rehabilitation center, were discussed. They are based on instrumental approaches to assessing the quality of medical care. It is shown that the use of Pareto assessment methods and the Taguchi loss function allows us to quantitatively characterize the improvement in the quality of care provided for PPPs. It is also shown that the indicators of clinical work and the average results of rehabilitation are close. However, the repeatability of results in PPP was significantly higher, and the number of medical errors decreased by 42%±3%. The integral evaluation by the Pareto and Taguchi methods turned out to be shifted towards PPP. The distance VA was 1.7 conventional units, which can be considered a quantitative proof of the effectiveness of the new format of the sanatorium's activities.


Saragiotis, P. (Ed.). (2009). Public-private partnerships in infrastructure days 2008. Washington, D.C., Dec 15-18 2008. Washington, D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

Taylor, R. J. (2003). Contracting for health services In A. Harding, & A. Preker (Eds.), Private Participation in Health Services. Health, Nutrition and Population (pp. 195-204). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Delmon, J. J. (2010). Understanding options for public-private partnerships in infrastructure: sorting out the forest from the trees: BOT, DBFO, DCMF, concession, lease... Policy Research working paper, WPS 5173. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Hammami, M., Ruhashyankiko, J. F., & Yehoue, E B. (2006). Determinants of public-private partnership in infrastructure. IMF working paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Baliga, B. S., Ravikiran, S. R., Rao, S. S., Coutinho, A., & Jain, A. (2016). Public-private partnership in health care: a comparative cross-sectional study of perceived quality of care among parents of children admitted in two government district-hospitals, Southern India. J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 10(2), SC05-SC09. doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2016/17124.7250.

Hanefeld, J., Powell-Jackson, T., & Balabanova, D. (2017). Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity. Bull. World Health Organ., 95(5), 368-374. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179309.

Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics: or how economists explain (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ehrgott, M. (2012). Vilfredo Pareto and multi-objective optimization. In M. Grötschel (Ed.), Optimization stories: 21st International Symposium on Mathematical Programming, Berlin, Aug 19-24, 2012 (pp. 447-453). (Documenta mathematica; Vol. 2012). Bielefeld.

Reinhardt, U. E. (2001). Can efficiency in healthcare be left to the market? J. Health Polit. Policy Law, 26(5), 967-992. doi: 10.1215/03616878-26-5-967.

Kumar, R., Chandrakar, R., Kumar, A., & Ram Chandrakar, H. (2012). Taguchi loss function as optimised model for supplier selection and evaluation. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., III(I), 268-270.

Taner, T., & Antony, J. (2006). Applying Taguchi methods to health care. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. Inc. Leadersh. Health Serv., 19(1), xxvi-xxxv.

Yu, K. (2010). Measuring efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the health care sector. In K. Yu. Essays on the theory and practice of index numbers: the making of macroeconomics data (pp. 103-146). Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

How to Cite
Hanynets, P., & Sinyenko, N. (2018). THE USE OF INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENTS TO DETERMINE THE QUALITY OF CARE IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. Medical Informatics and Engineering, (3), 58-63.