Development and validation of a mathematical model for predicting the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61751/bmbr/1.2024.15Keywords:
heartburn, regurgitation, oesophageal mucosa, gastrointestinal tract, bile, logistic regressionAbstract
The purpose of this study was to identify a set of prognostic factors for the progression of gastro-oesophageal
reflux disease for use in the development of a mathematical model for predicting this disease based on the results
of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. The study identified a range of prognostic factors for gastro-oesophageal reflux
disease and a statistical method was employed to determine the level of their correlation with the development of the
disease. The study found a link between certain clinical indicators and the occurrence of gastro-oesophageal reflux
disease, which led to the formation of a set of prognostic factors for the progression of gastro-oesophageal reflux
disease, including heartburn, frequent belching, regurgitation, damage to the mucous membrane of the oesophagus,
stomach, duodenum, the presence of chronic gastroduodenitis, gastrointestinal dysfunction, bile reflux. In creating
the mathematical prediction model, the logistic regression method was used to identify the correlation between the
patient’s clinical indicators and the occurrence of reflux disease and to determine the probability of its progression. To
bring the clinical information in line with the statistical formula, it was assigned the values of independent variables,
and the presence or absence of a particular indicator was coded using the binary number system. To test the developed
model, recommendations were given to assess the statistical significance of the independent variables to determine
its adequacy and to determine the predictive ability by testing on an independent sample of patients. The developed
prognostic model is of great practical significance for patients, the healthcare industry, and the further development
of the field, as it enables prompt detection of diseases and suitable prevention and treatment measures, increases the
diagnostic potential of the industry, optimises the allocation of medical resources, and leverages machine learning and
artificial intelligence capabilities based on the existing model
Received: 06.11.2023 | Revised: 15.01.2024 | Accepted: 27.02.2024
References
Reva T, Reva V, Trefanenko I, Shumko H, Gaidichuk V. Variants of gastroesophageal reflux disease depending on the type of reflux. Ukr J Med Biol Sport. 2022;7(1):171–76. DOI: 10.26693/jmbs07.01.171
Chue KM, Goh DWX, Chua CME, Toh BC, Ong LWL, Wong WK, et al. The Hill’s classification is useful to predict the development of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(6):1162–70. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05324-x
Shinozaki S, Osawa H, Hayashi Y, Miura Y, Yano T, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Predictors and timing for the development of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease after successful Helicobactor pylori eradication therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021;57(1):16–21. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1975310
Wessels EM, Masclee GMC, Bastiaansen BAJ, Fockens P, Bredenoord AJ. Incidence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Apr 8;36(6):e14794. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14794
Armstrong D, Hungin AP, Kahrilas PJ, Sifrim D, Sinclair P, Vaezi MF, Sharma P. Knowledge gaps in the management of refractory reflux‐like symptoms: Healthcare provider survey. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(10):e14387. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14387
Lee SP, Kae SH, Jang HJ, Koh DH, Jung ES. Inter‐observer variability of experts and trainees for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis: Comparison of linked color imaging, blue laser imaging, and white light imaging. J Dig Dis. 2021;22(7):425–32. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13023
Myasoyedov S, Andreieshchev S. Morpho-functional monitoring of the esophagus status as the base for the dispenser observation in the patients with achalasia of cardia after surgical esophagocardiomyotomy. Clin Surg. 2021;88(9–10):16–20. DOI: 10.26779/2522-1396.2021.9-10.16
Shevchenko B, Babii O, Prolom N, Titova M, Tarabarov S, Ushchina S. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in assessment of physiological cardia insufficiency during diagnosis of hiatal hernia. Gastroenterol. 2024;58(1):50–56.DOI: 10.22141/2308-2097.58.1.2024.587
Savarino E, Marabotto E, Savarino V. Recent insights on functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity. Cur Opin Gastroenterol. 2022;38(4):417–22. DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000846
Di Mario F, Crafa P, Franzoni L, Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Russo M, et al. A comparison of different symptomatic reflux esophagitis treatments: A real-world study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023;32(9):1075–80. DOI: 10.17219/acem/171001
HajHosseini P, Takalloozadeh M. An isotropic hyperelastic model of esophagus tissue layers along with three-dimensional simulation of esophageal peristaltic behavior. J Bioeng Res. 2019;1(2):12–27. DOI: 10.22034/JBR.2019.189018.1009
Miftahussurur M, Waskito LA, Syam AF, Nusi IA, Wibawa IDN, Rezkitha YAA, et al. Serum pepsinogen level as a biomarker for atrophy, reflux esophagitis, and gastric cancer screening in Indonesia. J Res Med Sci. 2022;27(1):90.DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_983_21
Wang M, Lou E, Xue Z. The role of bile acid in intestinal metaplasia. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1115250. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1115250
Causes and symptoms of esophagitis [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 19]. Available from: https://medikom.ua/simptomy-ehzofagita/
Yalaki S, Pulat H, Ilhan A. Localization of Helicobacter pylori gastritis and the relation of existing histopathological features with reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(1):27–33. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1701071
Dunn CP, Wu J, Gallagher SP, Putnam LR, Bildzukewicz NA, Lipham JC. Understanding the GERD barrier. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(6):459–68. DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001547
Hu ZW, Wang ZG, Wu JM, Tian SR, Zhang Y, Zhan XL, et al. Relationship between the severity of reflux esophagitis and the esophageal motility features on high resolution manometry. Chin Med J. 2017;97(42):3306–11.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.42.007
Chen L, Zhu G, She L, Ding Y, Yang C, Zhu F. Analysis of risk factors and establishment of a prediction model for endoscopic primary bile reflux: A single-center retrospective study. Front Med. 2021;8:758771. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.758771
Qu X, Shi Y. Bile reflux and bile acids in the progression of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Chin Med J. 2022;135(14):1664–72. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002290
Cohen J, Safdi MA, Deal SE, Baron TH, Chak A, Hoffman B, et al. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(4):886–91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00676.x
Barret M, Chaussade S, Boustière C, Canard JM, Schott AM, Ponchon T, et al. Diagnostic yield of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in France. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;45(4):101540. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.08.015
Martín‐Marcos I, Fernández‐Morte N, Balsategui‐Martín M, Ortiz‐Cantero A, Bermúdez‐Ampudia C, López‐Picado A, et al. Evaluation of pharyngeal lidocaine anesthesia for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Double‐blind randomized control trial. Dig Endosc. 2021;34(4):808–15. DOI: 10.1111/den.14168
Suda T, Shirota Y, Takimoto H, Tsukada Y, Takishita K, Nadamura T, et al. Image quality of abdominal ultrasonography after esophagogastroduodenoscopy is preserved by using carbon dioxide insufflation: A non-inferiority test in the same subject. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0275257. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275257
Bilder HG, Soccini C, Lasa JS, Zubiaurre I. Impact of time to esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Mexico. 2022;87(3):320–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2021.11.010
What are logistic models used for? [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 19]. Available from:https://www.houseofmath.com/uk/encyclopedia/funktsiyi/matematychni-modeli/typy-modeley/dlya-choho-vykorystovuyutsya-lohistychni-modeli
Hossain ME, Khan A, Moni MA, Uddin S. Use of electronic health data for disease prediction: A comprehensive literature review. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2021;18(2):745–58. DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2937862
Xu H, Duan Z, Miao C, Geng S, Jin Y. Development of a diagnosis model for coronary artery disease. Ind Heart J. 2017;69(5):634–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.022
Cui Z, Liu JX, Gao YL, Zhu R, Yuan SS. LncRNA-disease associations prediction using bipartite local model with nearest profile-based association inferring. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(5):1519–27. DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2019.2937827
Holcomb KM, Staples JE, Nett RJ, Beard CB, Petersen LR, Benjamin SG, et al. Multi-model prediction of West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease with machine learning for identification of important regional climatic drivers. GeoHealth. 2023;7(11):e2023GH000906. DOI: 10.1029/2023GH000906
Hao M, Huang X, Liu X, Fang X, Li H, Lv L, et al. Novel model predicts diastolic cardiac dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Ann Med. 2023;55(1):766–77. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2180154
Deng Y, Ma Y, Fu J, Wang X, Yu C, Lv J, et al. Combinatorial use of machine learning and logistic regression for predicting carotid plaque risk among 5.4 million adults with fatty liver disease receiving health check-ups: Population-based cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023;9:e47095. DOI: 10.2196/47095
Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: Seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–31. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207
Ahlawat S. Current state-of-the-art imaging techniques in the domain of whole-body MRI and its advantages over other whole-body PET in different musculoskeletal diseases. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(12):8573–75. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09883-8
Rastogi A. Changing role of histopathology in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(35):4000–13. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4000
Tandon A, Tandon S. Fallacies of mantoux in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis. J Assoc Physic India. 2022;70(12):94–95.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bulletin of Medical and Biological Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
