EVALUATION OF EARLY CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER SUTURING OF MENISCAL RUPTURES UNDER ARTHROSCOPIC CONTROL WITH “АLL-INSIDE” AND “INSIDE-OUT” TECHNIQUES

Authors

  • Y. O. Hrubar I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University
  • M. Y. Hrubar Ternopil University Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2021.2.11726

Keywords:

trauma, knee joint, meniscus damage, arthroscopy, meniscus suture

Abstract

Summary. Modern people with an active lifestyle and increasing of its duration perform more and more physical activity in everyday life and in sports, which increases the risk of meniscus damage. Meniscus surgery, including partial meniscectomy, has become one of the most common surgical orthopedic procedures, and the overall risk of meniscus damage requiring surgery in patients aged 10 to 64 years reaches 15 %. It is known that suturing of the damaged meniscus under arthroscopic control prevents early degenerative changes in the knee joint, especially in younger patients.

The aim of the study – to evaluate the early clinical and functional results after suturing of meniscal ruptures under arthroscopic control using the "all-inside" and "inside-out" techniques.

Materials and Methods. The study involved 39 patients aged 14 to 39 years with a knee joint injury. During the observation, 5 patients were lost for unknown reasons. Among 34 people included in the follow-up observation, 61.76 % were men (21) and 38.24 % were women (13). The age of patients was (22.3±3.2) years. The mean time from injury to surgery was (26.6±3.8) days. Examination of patients was performed according to the standards of medical care of patients with knee injuries. They included general clinical and instrumental research methods: radio­graphy, sonography and MRI. The system FAST-FIX ™ 360 was used for “all-inside” technique of meniscal rupture suturing and the system Arthrex 2.0 FiberWire Meniscus Repair Needles was used for “inside-out” technique.

Results and Discussion. According to the Lysholm J (1982) rating scale, the following results were obtained: “excellent” in 19 (55.89%) patients, “good” – 8 (23.52 %),  “satisfactory” 5 (14.70 %) and “not satisfactory "in 2 (5.89 %) patients. The reason of the unsatisfactory results was the early and inadequate load on the joint during rehabilitation in the first 3 months after the surgery.

Conclusions. The use of meniscus suture with “all-inside” technique using the system Fast-fix Fast-fix ™ 360 and with “inside-out” technique using the system Arthrex 2.0 FiberWire Meniscus Repair Needles allows safely suturing  the ruptures of the meniscus, especially the ruptures of the posterior horn and body and gives good clinical and functional results.

Author Biography

M. Y. Hrubar, Ternopil University Hospital

 

References

Vaquero-Picado A, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Arthroscopic repair of the meniscus. Surgical management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(11): 584-94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.170059.

Cook JL. The current status of treatment for large meniscal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435: 88-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200506000-00014.

Lembach M, Johnson DL. Meniscal repair techniques required for the surgeon performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2014;37: 617-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20140825-06.

Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10): 1756-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2017-0115.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10: 150-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658201000306.

Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30): 7411-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037.

McDermott ID, Amis AA The consequences of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(12): 1549-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.18140.

Muriuki MG, Tuason DA, Tucker BG, Harner CD. Changes in tibiofemoral contact mechanics following radial split and vertical tears of the medial meniscus an in vitro investigation of the efficacy of arthroscopic repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(12): 1089-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01241.

Petty CA, Lubowitz JH. Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy result in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review with a minimum of 8 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3): 419-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.08.016.

Woodmass JM, LaPrade RF, Sgaglione NA, Nakamura N, Krych AJ. Meniscal repair: reconsidering indications, techniques, and biologic augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1222-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00297.

Published

2021-09-02

How to Cite

Hrubar, Y. O., & Hrubar, M. Y. (2021). EVALUATION OF EARLY CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER SUTURING OF MENISCAL RUPTURES UNDER ARTHROSCOPIC CONTROL WITH “АLL-INSIDE” AND “INSIDE-OUT” TECHNIQUES. Bulletin of Medical and Biological Research, (2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2021.2.11726