INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS EFFICIENCY IN THE FIELD OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Authors

  • S. V. Denysenko The Clinic of Human Reproduction Problems of MPH of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2011.2.34

Abstract

Application of the information technologies is becoming increasingly important in the practice of molecular and cytogenetic analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in particular on the preimplantation level. Capacity of preimplantation diagnosis is based on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Interpretation of FISH/CGH results is performed with the help of Applied Cytovision System.

References

Зерова-Любимова Т. Е. Цитогенетичні методи дослідження хромосом людини : методичні рекомендації / Т. Е. Зерова-Любимова, Н. Г. Горовенко. - К. : КМАПО ім. П. Л. Шупика, 2003. - 25 с.

Dozortsev D. I. An improved fixation technique for fluorescence in situ hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis / D. I. Dozortsev, K. T. McGinnis // Feritil. Steril. -2001. - P. 186-188.

A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts / T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren [et al/] //Hum. Reprod. -2003. - P. 399-407

ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD centre for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening / Harton G., Braude P., Lashwood A. [et al.] //Hum. Reprod. - 2011. - P. 14-24.

ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group - best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis /screening (PGD/PGS) /G. L. Harton, M. C. Magli, K. Lundin [et al/] //Hum. Reprod. -2011. - P. 41-46.

Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations / S. Munne, M. Sandalinas, T. Escudero [et al.] //Fertil. Steril. -2000. - P. 1209-1218.

The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers / A. Pujol, J. Benet, C. Staessen [et al.] // Reproduction. - 2006. - P. 1025-1035.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004 / K. D. Sermon, A. Michiels, G. Harton [et al.] //Hum. Reprod. - 2007. - P. 323-336.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis - an overview / C. M. Ogilvie, P. R. Braude, P. N. Scriven // J. Histochemistry and Cytochemistry - 2005. - P. 255-260.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004 / K. D. Sermon, A. Michiels, G. Harton [et al.] //Hum. Reprod. - 2007. - P. 323-336.

Published

2012-11-02

How to Cite

Denysenko, S. V. (2012). INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS EFFICIENCY IN THE FIELD OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES. Medical Informatics and Engineering, (2). https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2011.2.34

Issue

Section

Articles