SOCIAL-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS OF EYE TRAUMA: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF AGE, GENDER AND PROFESSIONAL DETERMINANTS IN REGIONAL CONDITIONS

Authors

Keywords:

eye trauma; socio-demographic factors; occupational risk; logistic regression; epidemio- logical study; Zakarpattia region.

Abstract

Purpose. Comprehensive analysis of socio-demographic factors of eye injuries among the adult population of the Zakarpattia region with the identification of age, gender and professional determinants to substantiate differenti- ated preventive approaches. Materials and Methods. A retrospective epidemiological study of 949 cases of traumatic eye injuries in resi- dents of the Zakarpattia region aged ≥ 18 years in 2019–2024 was conducted. Epidemiological, medical-statistical, sociological and analytical methods were applied. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS 25.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019 with the calculation of incidence, prevalence, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and mul- tivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. Over six years, the primary incidence increased from 18.4 to 22.7 per 100,000 populations (an increase of 23.4%), the prevalence from 45.2 to 58.9 per 100,000. The working-age population aged 25–54 was mainly affected (42.8 per 100,000, 2.4 times higher than the regional average). Men accounted for 78.5% of those affected; the incidence was 36.2 versus 9.4 per 100,000 in women, RR = 3.85 (95% CI 3.52–4.21). A pronounced occupa- tional differentiation of risk was found: the highest rates were among industrial workers (89.4; RR = 3.94), construc- tion workers (71.8; RR = 3.16), agricultural workers (67.3; RR = 2.97) and the unemployed (47.6; RR = 2.10). The educational gradient was characterized by a threefold increase in risk in individuals with a low level of education (RR = 3.61; 95% CI 3.24–4.02). Urban residents had higher incidence and timeliness of treatment. Independent predictors of risk: employment in industry/construction (OR = 4.21), male gender (OR = 3.42), low educational level (OR = 2.83), age 25–54 years (OR = 2.67) and urban residence (OR = 1.87). Conclusions. Eye trauma pathology in the region has a clearly defined socio-demographic profile with a pre- dominance of able-bodied men in industrial, construction and agricultural professions, and people with low educa- tional levels. The identified risk predictors justify the need for intersectoral preventive programs for high-risk groups, increasing medical literacy and improving the availability of ophthalmological care for the rural population.

References

Steinmetz J. D., Bourne R. R. A., Briant P. S., Flaxman S. R., Taylor H. R., Jonas J. B. et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021. Vol. 9, No. 2. P. e144–e160. URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(20)30489-7/fulltext.

Blaszkowska M. K., Bartnik S. E., Crewe J. M., Clark A., Mackey D. A. The epidemiology of eye injuries in Western Australia: a retrospective 10-year study. Clin Exp Optom. 2023. Vol. 106, № 6. P. 633–639. DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2111198.

Lee B. W., Samarawickrama C. Closed globe and adnexal eye injuries: epidemiology, clinical and surgical outcomes, and an economic cost analysis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. Vol. 51, No. 5. P. 425–436. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14232.

Zungu T., Mdala S., Manda C., Twabi H.S., Kayange P. Characteristics and visual outcome of ocular trauma patients at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 3. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246155.

He C. H., Poulsen D. M., Parsikia A., Mbekeani J. N. Characteristics of ocular trauma in the United States. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2022. Vol. 85. P. 240–248. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20220035.

Pelletier J., Koyfman A., Long B. High risk and low prevalence diseases: open globe injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2023. Vol. 64. P. 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.036.

Kirichenko E. V., Akhyadov E. S. M., Sertakova O. The impact of health care reforms on improving the quality of medical services: international experience. Rev Geintec. 2021. Vol. 11, No. 4. P. 2915–2925.

Kyriakaki E. D., Symvoulakis E. K., Chlouverakis G., Detorakis E. T. Causes, occupational risk and socio-economic determinants of eye injuries: a literature review. Med Pharm Rep. 2021. Vol. 94, No. 2. P. 131–144. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1761.

Arıbaş Y. K., Sobacı G. Intraocular foreign bodies. Mechanical ocular trauma. Ocular Trauma / editor H. Yan. Singapore : Springer, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-6556-0_10.

Мазур Є., Короп О. Методологічні аспекти дослідження організації, якості та ефективності спеціалізованої медичної допомоги хворим з травматичними ушкодженнями ока. Здоров’я нації. 2025. № 2. С. 111–119. DOI: 10.32782/2077-6594/2025.2/16.

Jonak K., Matysiak M., Choragiewicz T., Nowakowska D., Zimenkovsky A., Shybinskyi V. et al. War-related eye trauma: a study of civilian and military cases from Ukraine’s ongoing conflict. Front Public Health. 2025. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1489445.

Брич В. В. Місце первинної медичної допомоги у забезпеченні медичною реабілітацією осіб з ураженнями опорно-рухового апарату: рекомендації Всесвітньої організації охорони здоров’я та ситуація в Україні. Клінічна та профілактична медицина. 2022. № 2 (20). С. 52–59. DOI: 10.31612/2616-4868.2(20).2022.06.

Мазур Є., Короп О. Соціологічні дослідження медико-соціальної проблеми очного травматизму в Закарпатському регіоні. Здоров’я нації. 2024. № 1. С. 28–34. DOI: 10.32782/2077-6594/2024.1/05.

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Belyaev, V. D. (2026). SOCIAL-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS OF EYE TRAUMA: COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF AGE, GENDER AND PROFESSIONAL DETERMINANTS IN REGIONAL CONDITIONS. Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Protection Organization of Ukraine, (1), 5–11. Retrieved from https://ojs.tdmu.edu.ua/index.php/visnyk-gigieny/article/view/16079

Issue

Section

Public health