Clinico-morphological features of complicated colon cancer in patients after surgical interventions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2026.3.16622

Keywords:

colon cancer, Hartmann’s operation, acute intestinal obstruction, colonic bleeding, paracolonic abscess, peritonitis

Abstract

The aim of the work: to improve the results of treatment of complicated colon cancer by comparative analysis of clinical and morphological features of patients of different age groups after emergency surgical interventions for complicated colon cancer.

Materials and Methods. The retrospective cohort study included 227 patients who underwent emergency resections for complicated colon cancer (CC) from 2021 to 2026 at the Pirogov Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital and the Podilsky Regional Center of Oncology of the Vinnytsia Regional Council. 227 patients were included in the study. There were two groups of patients: I group – up to 60 years, II group – 60 years and older. In the II group, two subgroups were distinguished: patients aged 60 to 74 years and patients 75 years and older. The primary point of the study was an assessment of postoperative complications according to the Clavien – Dindo classification within 30 days after surgery. The secondary point was the study of oncological adequacy of the operation.

Results. Group I included 47 (20.7 %) patients, group II – 180 (79.3 %) patients. High comorbidity was more common in group II (46.8 and 100 %). A difference was found between the groups by T-status: in group I there were more cases of T2–T3 (76.6 vs. 46.7 %), while in group II – T4 (53.3 vs. 23.4 %). The majority of patients in group I had pN2 status (68.1 %), in group II – the pN1 status prevailed (70 %). In group II, there were more oncologically inadequately performed operations: 54 (30 %) vs. group I – 2 (4.3 %). The main factors that influenced the radicality of the performed operation: type of urgent complication; type of operation (Hartmann type operation); comorbidity; physical status of patients according to ASA; tumor localization. The results obtained indicate that the clinical and morphological features of patients with complicated CC significantly depend on age. Elderly and senile patients were more likely to have high comorbidity, worse ASA physical status, and less oncological radicality of surgical interventions, while patients younger than 60 years were more likely to have more pronounced metastatic involvement of regional lymph nodes.

Сonclusions. Age-related differences in clinical and morphological characteristics of patients with complicated colon cancer have been established, which must be taken into account when choosing the scope of emergency surgery and assessing its oncological adequacy.

Author Biographies

  • Volodymyr Shaprynskyi, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    MD, DSc (Medicine), Professor, Head of Department of Surgery No. 1 with a Urology Course

  • Oleksii Kaminskyi, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor of Department of Surgery No. 1 with a Urology Course

  • Oleh Vorovskyi, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    MD, DSc (Medicine), Professor of Department of Surgery No. 1 with a Urology Course

  • Volodymyr Dronenko, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor of Department of Oncology, X-ray diagnostics and Therapy

  • Yurii Myronyshen, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    Assistant Professor of Department of Surgery No. 1 with a Urology Course

  • Oleksandr Chernychenko, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya

    Assistant Professor of Department of Surgery No. 1 with a Urology Course

  • Mykhailo Verba, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Communal Non-Profit Enterprise “Podilsky Regional Center of Oncology of the Vinnytsia Regional Council”, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

    Intern in Surgery

References

1. Golder AM, McMillan DC, Horgan PG, Roxburgh CSD. Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4366. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08447-y. PMID: 35288664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08447-y

2. Fullard K, Steffens D, Solomon M, Shin JS, Koh C. Measuring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer presentation: a retrospective comparative study. ANZ J Surg. 2023; 93(12):2951-57. DOI: 10.1111/ans.18701. PMID: 37846781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18701

3. Muldoon RL. Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(4):251-61. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729922. PMID: 34305474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729922

4. Veld JV, Beek KJ, Consten ECJ, Ter Borg F, van Westreenen HL, Bemelman WA, et al. Definition of large bowel obstruction by primary colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(4):787-804. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15479. PMID: 33305454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15479

5. Miller AS, Boyce K, Box B, Clarke MD, Duff SE, Foley NM, et al. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(2):476-547. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15503. PMID: 33470518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15503

6. Zhou J, Wan S, Li C, Ding Z, Qian Q, Yu H, et al. Retroperitoneal abscess as a presentation of colon cancer: The largest case set analysis to date, which extracted from our unit and the literature. Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1198592. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198592. PMID: 37941542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1198592

7. Tanaka Y, Fujii S, Kusaka T. Early-stage colorectal cancer with massive bleeding. IGIE. 2023; 2(2):110-12. DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2023.03.006. PMID: 41647624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igie.2023.03.006

8. Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR, Hawkins AT, Langenfeld SJ, Shaffer VO, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022; 65(2):148-77. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002323. PMID: 34775402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002323

9. Costa G, Frezza B, Fransvea P, Massa G, Ferri M, Mercantini P, et al.. Clinico-pathological Features of Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Comparison Between Elderly and Non-elderly Patients. Open Med (Wars). 2019; 14:726-34. DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0082. PMID: 31637303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0082

10. Michaud Maturana M, English WJ, Nandakumar M, Li Chen J, Dvorkin L. The impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2021; 91(11):2322-29. DOI: 10.1111/ans.16941. PMID: 34013571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16941

11. De Simone B, Kluger Y, Moore EE, Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Coccolini F, et al. The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study. World J Emerg Surg. 2023; 18(1):32. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3. PMID: 37118816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3

12. Menassa M, Stronks K, Khatmi F, Roa Díaz ZM, Espinola OP, Gamba M, et al. Concepts and definitions of healthy ageing: a systematic review and synthesis of theoretical models. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 56:101821. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm. 2022.101821. PMID: 36684393.

13. Xia L, Yin R, Mao L, Shi X. Prevalence and impact of frailty in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on modified frailty index. J Surg Oncol. 2024; 130(3):604-12. DOI: 10.1002/jso.27778. PMID: 39016206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27778

14. Han J, Zhang Q, Lan J, Yu F, Liu J. Frailty worsens long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1326292. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1326292. PMID: 38406806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1326292

15. Cai M, Gao Z, Liao J, Jiang Y, He Y. Frailty affects prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1017183. DOI: 10.3389/fonc. 2022.1017183. PMID: 36408138.

16. Cauley CE, Samost-Williams A, Philpotts L, Brindle M, Cooper Z, Ritchie CS. Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surge­ry: A Systematic Review. J Surg Res. 2024; 296:720-34. DOI: 0.1016/j.jss.2023.12.055. PMID: 38367523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.055

17. Maeda H, Takahashi M, Seo S, Hanazaki K. Frailty and Colorectal Surgery: Review and Concept of Cancer Frailty. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15):5041. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155041. PMID: 37568445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155041

18. Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, Cimbanassi S, Poiasina E, Ceresoli M, et al. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J Emerg Surg. 2018; 13:36. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3. PMID: 30123315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3

19. Sugiyama M, Nishijima TF, Kasagi Y, Uehara H, Yoshida D, Nagai T, et al. Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment strategies and complications in older adults with colorectal cancer considering surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2024; 130(2):329-37. DOI: 10.1002/jso.27736. PMID: 38881197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27736

20. McHugh FT, Ryan ÉJ, Ryan OK, Tan J, Boland PA, Whelan MC, et al. Management Strategies for Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity Score Matching Studies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024; 67(7):878-94. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003256. PMID: 38557484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003256

21. Binetti M, Lauro A, Tonini V. Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020. World J Clin Oncol. 2022; 13(12):957-66. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.957. PMID: 36618078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.957

22. McKechnie T, Springer JE, Cloutier Z, Archer V, Alavi K, Doumouras A, et al. Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(6):4159-78. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4. PMID: 36869265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4

23. Zhou H, Jin Y, Wang J, Chen G, Chen J, Yu S. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival between emergency and elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):41. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04334-8. PMID: 36790519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04334-8

24. Arnarson Ö, Axmarker T, Syk I. Short- and long-term outcomes following bridge to surgery and emergency resection in acute malignant large bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis. 2023; 25(4):669-78. DOI: 10.1111/codi.16458. PMID: 36567604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16458

25. Orsenigo E, Gasparini G, Carlucci M. Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Lymph Node Yield in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019; 2019:5197914. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5197914. PMID: 30804995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5197914

26. Liu Q, Huang M, Yang J, Jiang M, Zhao Z, Zhao H, et al. Association between the number of retrieved lymph nodes and demographic/tumour-related characteristics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e072244. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072244. PMID: 38135324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072244

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Original investigations

How to Cite

Clinico-morphological features of complicated colon cancer in patients after surgical interventions. (2026). Hospital Surgery. Journal Named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk, 3, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2026.3.16622