HYBRID LEARNING IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN ACADEMIC AUTONOMY, DIGITALIZATION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2026.3.16630

Keywords:

hybrid learning; medical education; academic autonomy; digitalization; social inclusion; continuity of education; conceptual model; crisis conditions

Abstract

Modern medical education in Ukraine operates under prolonged crisis conditions, creating an urgent need for flexible educational models capable of ensuring the continuity of the learning process. While hybrid learning has gradually evolved worldwide as part of the digital transformation of education, in Ukraine it has become an essential mechanism for adapting to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the full-scale war. Security risks, power outages, forced displacement of students and academic staff, and unequal access to digital infrastructure have necessitated the search for optimal approaches to integrating theoretical instruction with practical clinical training. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of hybrid learning in medical education and to develop a conceptual model illustrating the interaction between academic autonomy, digitalization, and social inclusion. The study was conducted at Donetsk National Medical University during the 2024–2025 academic year using a crosssectional design and an anonymous questionnaire survey. The study included 53 sixth-year medical students (Specialty 222 “Medicine”) who had studied under a hybrid learning model for at least one semester. The questionnaire consisted of 24 items grouped into four sections: access to digital infrastructure, organization of the educational process, assessment and academic engagement, and socio-geographical characteristics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. The findings demonstrated that digitalization is a necessary but insufficient condition for the effectiveness of hybrid learning. Nearly half of the respondents (47.2 %) positively assessed its impact on learning outcomes; however, a substantial proportion emphasized the importance of organizational flexibility and expanding opportunities for clinical training. Video lectures and digital educational resources were identified as the most effective instructional tools (56.6 %), while simulationbased training received high effectiveness ratings from 73.6 % of respondents. At the same time, socio-geographical factors, including forced displacement and limited access to clinical training sites, significantly affected students’ ability to participate fully in the educational process. Based on the findings, a conceptual model of hybrid learning was developed, incorporating three interrelated components: academic autonomy, digitalization, and social inclusion. Academic autonomy ensures the adaptability of managerial decisions and the flexibility of educational organization; digitalization provides the technological environment necessary for implementing hybrid learning; and social inclusion guarantees equitable access to education regardless of students’ location or security conditions. The practical experience of Donetsk National Medical University confirms the effectiveness of the proposed model and highlights its potential for implementation in other higher medical education institutions in Ukraine.

References

1. Burmeister, J. R., Zazay, I., & Pratt, R. L. (2025). Beyond the binary: A five-pillar framework for hybrid medical education post-pandemic. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251395293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251395293

2. Code, J. (2025). The entangled learner: Critical agency for the postdigital era. Postdigital Science and Education, 7 (2), 336–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00544-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00544-1

3. Delenko, V., & Sholovii, M.-T. (2023). Zmishane navchannia yak shliakh do reheneratsii suchasnoi osvity [Blended learning as a pathway to the renewal of modern education]. Visnyk of Lviv University. Series Pedagogics – Journal of Lviv University. Series: Pedagogy, (39), 51–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/vpe.2023.39.12033 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/vpe.2023.39.12033

4. Hanberher, I. I., Marchenkova, N. O., & Riabokon, S. S. (2025). Hibrydni modeli navchannia v medychnii osviti Ukrainy ta otsinka yikhnoi efektyvnosti dlia formuvannia praktychnykh navychok[Hybrid learning models in Ukrainian medical education and assessment of their effectiveness for developing practical skills]. Perspektyvy ta innovatsii v nautsi – Prospects and Innovations of Science, 10 (56), 2424–2439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2025-10 (56) [in Ukrainian].

5. Hurevych, R., Hordiichuk, H., Konoshevskyi, L., Konoshevskyi, O., Kusii, M., & Drachuk, M. (2023). Zmishane navchannia yak suchasna forma pobudovy navchalnoho protsesu [Blended learning as a modern form of building the educational process]. Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii ta innovatsiini metody navchannia u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodolohiia, teoriia, dosvid, problem – Modern Information Technologies and Innovative Teaching Methods in Training Specialists: Methodology, Theory, Experience, Problems, (69), 14–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2023-69-14-35 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2023-69-14-35

6. Kamaruzaman, N. A., & Hasan, N. A. M. (2026). Reimagining inclusive HyFlex teaching through participatory communication and Universal Design for Learning. Learning Environments Research, 29, Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09567-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09567-2

7. Lutsenko, R., Lutsenko, O., Vazhnichaya, E., Sydorenko, A., Rud, M., & Petrenko, L. (2026). Analysis of academic performance of medical students in studying pharmacology during quarantine and martial law in Ukraine. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1701632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1701632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1701632

8. Perederii, N. O., Yeroshenko, H. A., Vatsenko, A. V., Ulanovska-Tsyba, N. A., Klepets, O. V., Ryabushko, O. B., Shevchenko, K. V., Grigorenko, A. S., & Donets, I. M. (2025). Zmishane navchannia – suchasna efektyvna hibrydna forma osvity mizh onlain- i oflain-formatamy v pidhotovtsi maibutnikh likariv. [Blended Learning as a Modern Effective Hybrid Educational Model Combining Online and Offline Formats in the Training of Future Physicians]. In Intehratsiini ta innovatsiini napriamy rozvytku medychnoi osvity: Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu (pp. 189–190). Retrieved from: https://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26084 [in Ukrainian].

9. Price, E., & Winchester, T. (2025). Designing for diversity: A scoping review of equity in higher education’s blended learning practices. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52, 3465–3483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00859-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00859-9

10. Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Mariano, A. M., & Santos, M. R. (2025). Digital and sustainable education and social inclusion: A bibliometric review with the consolidated meta-analytical approach. Sustainability, 17 (13), Article 5677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677

11. Safdieh, J. E., Chan, J., Falcone, D., & Abramson, E. L. (2026). Preparing physicians for tomorrow’s practice: Contemporary practice competencies as a framework for technology-driven change. JMIR Medical Education, 12, Article e90637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/90637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/90637

12. Shvets, L., & Shapoval, I. (2024). Suchasna medychna osvita: balans mizh tradytsiiamy ta innovatsiiamy v umovakh vyklykiv sohodennia [Modern medical education: A balance between traditions and innovations in the face of today’s challenges]. Medytsyna ta farmatsiia: osvitni dyskursy – Medicine and Pharmacy: Educational Discourses, (4), 155–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/eddiscourses/2024-4-24 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/eddiscourses/2024-4-24

13. Sobchenko, S. V. (2021). Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii [Problems and prospects of higher education development in the conditions of digitalization]. Pedahohika ta psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity – Pedagogy and Psychology of Vocational Education, 75 (3), 73–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2021.75-3.14 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2021.75-3.14

14. Vesova, O., Kaminskyy, V., & Kryvosheieva, A. (2025). Hibrydni stratehii vykladannia v medychnii osviti Ukrainy ta yikhnii vnesok u vdoskonalennia profesiinykh kompetentsii [Hybrid teaching strategies in medical education in Ukraine and their contribution to the improvement of professional competencies]. Okhorona zdorovia ta osvita – Health & Education, (4), 210–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2025.4.29 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2025.4.29

15. Vorona, I. I., Prokop, I. A., & Kitura, H. Ya. (2024). Osoblyvosti zmishanoho navchannia v umovakh viiny [Features of blended learning in wartime conditions]. Medychna osvita – Medical education, (1), 71–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2024.1.14584 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2024.1.14584

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN HIGHER MEDICAL EDUCATION

How to Cite

HYBRID LEARNING IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN ACADEMIC AUTONOMY, DIGITALIZATION, AND SOCIAL INCLUSION. (2026). Medical Education, 3, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2026.3.16630