NEUROANATOMICAL NOMENCLATURE: FROM ANCIENT METAPHOR TO MODERN MORPHOLOGICAL STANDARD

Authors

  • Oksana Lopatkina Vinnytsia National Pirogov Memorial Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-5180
  • Ganna Galunko Vinnytsia National Pirogov Memorial Medical University
  • Tetiana Antoniuk Vinnytsia National Pirogov Memorial Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2026.3.16550

Keywords:

latin language; medical terminology; anatomical nomenclature; central nervous system; neuromorphology

Abstract

Unlike medical terminology, which is a general system of concepts, medical nomenclature serves as its regulatory foundation. The primary goal of modern medical terminology is to establish a unified standard for designating anatomical structures, thereby preventing errors that arise from the use of non-nomenclature terms. In a world where the mobility of both specialists and patients has become the norm, proficiency in a country’s language should not be a barrier to providing healthcare. This is why there is an urgent need for a universal Latin nomenclature to serve as a common benchmark for numerous national translations. Given the critical importance of the central nervous system as the primary regulatory center of vital functions, our study focuses on a detailed morphological characterization and the topographic-anatomical features of its individual components. The aim of our work is to develop an algorithm for a unified description of the anatomical structures of the brain and spinal cord, based on modern standards of international anatomical terminology. The use of standardized Latin terminology is not merely adherence to an academic tradition, but a critically essential condition for ensuring the accuracy of medical communication on a global scale. Latin acts as a “lingua franca” for physicians worldwide, allowing specialists from different countries to interpret the complex architecture of the brain in a unified manner. Command of classical terminology ensures a high level of mutual understanding among medical communities, facilitates the seamless integration of scientific achievements, and guarantees the accuracy of the diagnostic and neurosurgical process, regardless of the linguistic environment in which the physician practices.

References

1. Carbone, A. L. (2023). Anatomies of Aristotle’s Anatomai. Anthropozoologica, 58 (11), 107–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2023v58a11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2023v58a11

2. Chmielewski, P. P. (2022). Anatomical and medical terminology: new challenges and perspectives. Medical Journal of Cell Biology, 10 (4), 102–107. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2478/acb-2022-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2022-0016

3. Chmielewski, P. P., & Mozdziak, P. E. (2023). Teaching anatomical terminology: effective learning strategies in medical education. Medical Journal of Cell Biology, 11 (4), 114–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2023-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2023-0019

4. Kachlik, D., Baca, V., Bozdechova, I., Cech, P., & Musil, V. (2008). Anatomical terminology and nomenclature: past, present and highlights. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 30 (6), 459–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0357-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0357-y

5. Kobayashi, S., Matsushima, T., Sakai, T., Matsushima, K., Bertalanffy, H., & Rutka, J. T. (2022). Evolution of microneurosurgical anatomy with special reference to the history of anatomy, surgical anatomy, and microsurgery: historical overview. Neurosurgical Review, 45 (1), 253–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01597-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01597-z

6. Mavrodi, A., & Paraskevas, G. (2014). Morphology of the heart associated with its function as conceived by ancient Greeks. International journal of cardiology, 172 (1), 23–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.124

7. Moxham, P. B. J., & Sprumont, P. (2016). Anatomical Terms: towards Development of Terminologies (terminogenesis). Head to head. Eur. J. Anat, 20 (3), 281–285. Retrieved from: https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/306251

8. Muminova, O. (2025). The historical and contemporary role of the latin language in the development of medical science and the formation of its terminology. In International Conference on Business & Management (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 177–182). Retrieved from: https://zenodo.org/records/18141410

9. Sprumont, P. (2016). Anatomical terms: towards development of Terminologies (terminogenesis). European Journal of anatomy, 20, 249–280. Retrieved from: https://www.eurjanat.com/v1/journal/paper.php?id=160201ps

10. Ten Donkelaar, H. J., Broman, J., Neumann, P. E., Puelles, L., Riva, A., Tubbs, R. S., & Kachlik, D. (2017). Towards a terminologia neuroanatomica. Clinical Anatomy, 30 (2), 145–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22809

11. Ten Donkelaar, H. J., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., & Mai, J. K. (2018). Toward a common terminology for the gyri and sulci of the human cerebral cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 12, 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00093

12. Triantafyllou, G., & Piagkou, M. (2025). Greek anatomical nomenclature: the urgent need for evidence-based standardization. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 47 (1), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-025-03767-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-025-03767-w

13. Yagin, F. H., & de Sousa Fernandes, M. S. (2024). The importance of medical terminology in the health sector. Journal of Exercise Science & Physical Activity Reviews, 2 (1), 132–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11544933

14. Yapijakis, C. (2009). Hippocrates of Kos, the father of clinical medicine, and Asclepiades of Bithynia, the father of molecular medicine. in vivo, 23 (4), 507–514. Retrieved from: https://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/23/4/507.short

15. Zhang, Z., Gao, Y., Lin, X., He, X., Wang, X., & Liu, S. (2025). Mapping Fetal Brain Development of 10 Weeks’ Gestational Age with 9.4 T Postmortem MRI and Histologic Sections. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 46 (5), 1029–1035. Retrieved from: https://www.ajnr.org/content/46/5/1029.abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8595

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC CULTURE IN MEDICAL EDUCATION

How to Cite

NEUROANATOMICAL NOMENCLATURE: FROM ANCIENT METAPHOR TO MODERN MORPHOLOGICAL STANDARD. (2026). Medical Education, 3, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2026.3.16550