MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY OF THE ORAL MUCOSA AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN DENTAL PROSTHESIS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2026.2.16428

Keywords:

gingival mucosa, dental morbidity, orthopedic rehabilitation, gingival biotype, gingival phenotype, partial and complete tooth loss, implantology

Abstract

The article presents the results of an analytical review of the literature on the morphological features of the gingival mucosa, as well as the role of their differences in the process of planning and carrying out measures for orthopedic rehabilitation of dental patients.
The purpose of the study is to analyze the data of available literary sources on the morphological variability of the oral mucosa and its significance in planning orthopedic rehabilitation of patients and preventing complications.
Materials and methods of the study. The study used a bibliosematic approach, information search and systematic analysis of scientific sources using the Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar scientometric databases over the past 15 years.
Results. The analysis of literary sources showed that in the historical aspect, various definitions were used to determine the variants of the morphological features of the oral mucosa that are important in dentistry. De Rouck T. and co-authors described three gingival biotypes: thin-scalloped, thick-scalloped, and thick-flat. The Working Group of the III World Workshop (2017) on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions recommended adopting the term “periodontal phenotype” as a combination of gingival phenotype (three-dimensional gingival volume) and buccal bone plate thickness (bone morphotype), noting that the term “phenotype” indicates a dimension that may change over time depending on environmental factors and clinical intervention, and may be specific to a particular localization. In implantology, the morphological characteristics of soft tissues – their thickness, degree of keratinization, width of keratinized mucosa – are considered key predictors of peri-implant tissue stability, which makes further studies of anatomical norm variants and systematization of methods for preventing complications relevant.
Conclusions. When diagnosing the condition of the dentofacial system and planning orthopedic treatment, dental implantation, restorative surgical interventions, augmentation operations with insufficient supply of bone tissue in the area of the edentulous alveolar process, planning “pink aesthetics”, individual, specific for each patient, variants of the physiological norm should be taken into account, which necessitates the need for further study and analysis of literary sources as a basis for determining the directions of development of promising rehabilitation technologies.

References

Денисова Є.Г., Соколова І.І. Біотипи пародонта і рецесія ясен: гігієнічні аспекти. Експериментальна і клінічна медицина. 2015; 4(69):143-147.

Aguilar-Duran L., Mir-Mari J., Figueiredo R., Valmaseda-Castellón E. Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Jan;25(1):e144-е149. doi:10.4317/medoral.23280. PMID: 31880279 PMCID: PMC6982987.

Bud E., Vlasa A., Pacurar M., Matei A., Bud A., Szoke A-R., Minervini G. A Retrospective Histological Study on Palatal and Gingival Mucosa Changes during a Rapid Palatal Expansion Procedure. Biomedicines. 2023 Dec;11(12):3246. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123246. PMID: 38137467. PMCID: PMC10740776.

Couso-Queiruga E., Porto Barboza E., Avila-Ortiz G., Gonzalez-Martin O., Chambrone L., Rodrigues D. M. Relationship between supracrestal soft tissue dimensions and other periodontal phenotypic features: A cross-sectional study J Periodontol. 2023 Aug;94(8):944-955. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0434. PMID: 36797817

Cuny-Houchmand M., Renaudin S., Leroul M., Planche L., Le Guehennec L., Soueidan A. Gingival biotype: The probe test utility. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2013 May;3(2):123-127. doi:10.4236/ojst.2013.32023

Dhingra K., Prakash S. Gingival overgrowth in partially edentulous ridges in an elderly female patient with epilepsy: a case report. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e1201-1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00624.x. PMID: 22612838.

Esfahrood Z.R., Kadkhodazadeh M., Ardakani M.R.T. Gingival biotype: a review. Gen Dent. 2013 Jul;61(4):14-17. PMID: 23823337

De Rouck T., Eghbali R., Collys K., De Bruyn H., Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):428-433. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x. PMID: 19419444

Jepsen S., Caton J.G., Albandar J.M., Bissada N.F. et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89(Suppl 1):S237–S248. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0733. PMID: 29926943.

Kalina E., Górski B., Fester A., Zadurska M. Methods of gingival biotype assessment. J Stoma 2014 August;67(4):503-512. doi:10.5604/00114553.1118753

Kim D.M., Bassir S.H., Nguyen Thomas T. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020 Ma;91(3):311-338. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0337. Epub 2020 Jan 16. PMID: 31691970.

Lan Li Measurement and clinical significance of gingival biotype in anterior teeth. Journal of Integrative Medicine 2020 Aug; 9(1):12-16. doi: 10.30564/jim.v9i1.2235

Lee Angie, Fu Jia-Hui, Wang Hom-Lay Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent. 2011 Jun;20(3):e38-47. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182181d3d. PMID: 21613940

Malhotra R., Grover V., Bhardwaj A., Mohindra K. Analysis of the gingival biotype based on the measurement of the dentopapillary complex. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):43–47. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.128199 PMCID: PMC3988642 PMID: 24744543

Malpartida-Carrillo V., Tinedo-Lopez P.L., Guerrero M.E., Amaya-Pajares S.P., Ozcan, M., Rosing C.K. Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2021 Apr;33(3):432-445. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12661. Epub 2020 Sep 21. PMID: 32955762.

Motta S. H.G., Camacho M. P.F., Quintela D.C., Santana R.B. Relationship Between Clinical and Histologic Periodontal Biotypes in Humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):737-741. doi: 10.11607/prd.2501. PMID: 28817140.

Pilloni A., Marini L., Zeza B., Ferlosio A., Aghazada R. Histologic Analysis of Clinically Healthy Human Gingiva in Patients with Altered Passive Eruption. Dent J (Basel). 2021 Mar;9(3):29. doi: 10.3390/dj9030029. PMID: 33800922 PMCID: PMC7999146

Papapetros D., Nylander K., Kalfas S. Histomorphometric Evaluation of Gingival Phenotypic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study. Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul;13(8):350. doi: 10.3390/dj13080350. PMCID: PMC12385038 PMID: 40863053.

Papapetros D., Nylander K., Kalfas S. Gingival phenotypes and dimensions of the soft periodontal tissues: a cross-sectional clinical and histological study. Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Nov11;29(12):563. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06636-3. PMID: 41217535.

Papapetros D. M. Characterization of the Gingival Phenotype at the Clinical, Cellular and Molecular Level. PhD Thesis. Thessaloniki, 2025; 199р.

Sonar P. V., Mahale S., Kadam P., Chaudhari D. Gingival keratinization-review. International Journal of Current Research. 2018 May;10(05):69059-69063

Januário A.L., Duarte W.R., Barriviera M., Mesti J.C., Araújo M.G., Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clinical Oral Implants Research.2011. Vol. 22(10). P. 1168–1171.

De Santis D., Zucchelli G. Soft tissue thickness modifications in esthetic implant sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2021. Vol. 32(2). P. 153–173

Chappuis V., Rahman L., Buser R., Janner S.F., Belser U.C., Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. Journal of Dental Research. 2018. Vol. 97(3). P. 266–274.

Sanz M., Chapple I.L. Clinical research on periimplant diseases: consensus report of Working Group 4. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2012. Vol. 39(Suppl. 12). P. 202–206.

Нідзельський М. Я., Давиденко Г. М., Кузнецов В. В. Ортопедична стоматологія для лікарів-інтернів: навч. посіб. / За ред. М. Я. Нідзельського. Полтава: УМСА, 2019. 304 с.

Дієв Є.В. Клініко-організаційні основи надання стоматологічної допомоги із застосуванням дентальних імплантатів: дис. ... канд. мед. наук: 14.01.22. Одеса: Інститут стоматології, 2021. 184 с.

Методи протезування зубів в сучасній стоматології. FuturumDentistry. 2023. URL: https://futurum-dentistry.com/protezuvannya-zubiv (дата звернення: 02.02.2025).

Технологія виготовлення незнімних зубних про-тезів : навч. посіб. Полтава: УМСА, 2020. URL: https://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17612/1/Tehnologii_vugotovlennia_ort_konstr.pdf (дата звернення: 02.02.2025).

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Ortopedic stomatology

How to Cite

MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY OF THE ORAL MUCOSA AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN DENTAL PROSTHESIS (LITERATURE REVIEW). (2026). Clinical Dentistry, 2, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2026.2.16428