OBSTETRICIANS’ TACTICS IN THE DELIVERY BY PATIENTS WITH BREECH POSITION OF THE FOETUS AFFECTED BY THE UTERINE MYOMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11603/24116-4944.2018.2.9542Keywords:
pelvic fetal pregnancy, uterine myoma, cesarean section, conservative childbirthAbstract
The aim of the study – improvement of pregnancy outcomes in women with pelvic presentation on the background of uterine myoma by developing optimal obstetric delivery tactics.
Materials and Methods. In order to achieve the stated goal, a prospective analysis of cases of first- and second-time delivering patients with full-term one fetus pregnancy in pelvic presentation (incomplete and complete) amid the uterine myoma – the main group (MG) – (n = 30) was conducted. Into the control group (CG) – (n = 30) were included the first- and second-time bearing women without fetal myoma with full-time pregnancy and the pelvic presentation. Statistical processing of the results was performed using the Microsoft Office Excel 2017 software.
Results and Discussion. The analysis of the presented data shows that among pregnant women with pelvic prevalence of fetuses on the background of uterine fibroids, more frequent cases are registered: clinical manifestations of the threat of interruption of pregnancy MG – 26 (86.7 %), CG – 9 (30 %) and pre-eclampsia MG – 8 (26.7 %), CG – 3 (10 %) (p < 0.05). Raising the risk of complications of pregnancy and the expected birth of the uterine myoma requires pre-planning for the most part the operational method of delivery of MG – 19 (63.3 %). Exception, in the absence of other contraindications, there may be women with single myomatous nodes in sizes up to 5 cm – 11 (36.7 %). Only the extension of the cesarean section requires only pregnant women with uterine myoma 7 (36.8 %), and most of these interventions occur during precarious surgical delivery 4 (20 %).
Conclusion. Consequently, the presented data indicate the expediency and validity of taking into account the presence of uterine myoma at BP in order to develop an optimal obstetric tactic for the delivery of such patients in order to improve their pregnancy outcomes.
References
Alekhin, M.N., Caleva, O.Yu., & Sidorenko, B.A. (2012). Pregnancy and childbirth of high risk. Obstetrics, 11, 9-13.
Fominova, G.V., Lyalichkina, N.A., Kosenko, Yu.Yu., Fominova, I.S., & Zakharov, A.A. (2018). The course of the gestation process and the delivery of patients with the myoma of the uterus. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 4.
EPOC: Resources for review authors (2017). Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC). The proposed risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. London: Cochrane. Retrieved from: http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specificresources-review-authors.
Ouyang, D.W., & Norwitz, E.R. (2014). Pregnancy in women with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids): Literature review. UpToDate, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.uptodate.com/content/pregnancy-in-women-with-uterine-leiomyomasfibroids.
Stewart, E.A. (2015). Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. N. Engl. J. Med., 372, 1646-1655.
Topcu, H.O., Iskender, C.T., Timur, H., Kaymak, O., Memur, T., & Danışman, N. (2015). Outcomes after Caesarean myomectomy versus cesarean alone among pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 130, 244-246.
(2016). WHO recommendations for antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/antenatalcare-pregnancy-positive-experience.
(2016). The WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG, 123 (5), 667-670. doi 10.1111 / 1471-0528.13526.
Zhang, J., Geerts, C., Hukkelhoven, C., Offerhaus, P., Zwart, J., & de Jonge, A. (2016). Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes. BJOG, 123 (5), 754-761.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the journal right of first publication of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
2. Authors are entitled to enter into a separate agreement on additional non-exclusive distribution of work in the form in which it was published in the magazine (eg work place in the electronic repository institution or publish monographs in part), provided that the reference to the first publication of this magazine.
3. Policy magazine allows and encourages authors placement on the Internet (eg, in storage facilities or on personal websites) manuscript of how to submit the manuscript to the editor and during his editorial processing, since it contributes to productive scientific discussion and positive impact on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work (see. The Effect of Open Access).
