Review

1. Does the title of the manuscript correspond to its content?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

2. Does the submitted manuscript contain new scientific information?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

3. Does the manuscript contain practical implications contributing to the development of medical sciences?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

4. Does the purpose of the manuscript clearly defined and achieved?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

5. Are material and methods selected and described correctly?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

6. Does the work meet ethical standards?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

7. Were statistical methods selected and used correctly?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly
•  Not applicable

8. Are the results of the study reliable?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

9. Are the tables / figures presented in a correct, legible, concise and orderly way?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly
•  Not applicable

10. Are conclusions formulated correctly, directly from the manuscript?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

11. Is the selected literature up-to-date, and used correctly / sufficiently?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

12. Is layout of the study and its internal structure in accordance with the editorial requirements for the authors?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

13. Is content of the study presented clearly, written in an understandable language using the correct terminology?*

•  Yes
•  No
•  Partly

14. Comments for the authors*

15. Information for editors (not visible to the authors)*

16. Conclusion:*

•  а) The study is suitable for publication in the presented form
•  b) The study is suitable for publication after revision and re-review
•  с) The manuscript is not suitable for publication