THE SCIENCE OF DATA AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE

Authors

  • O. P. Mintser Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • L. Yu. Babintseva Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • P. P. Hanynets Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • O. V. Sarkanych Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • O. O. Sukhanova Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • A. G. Gabovych Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2025.1-2.15990

Keywords:

Evidence-based medicine, meta-analysis, precision medicine, systematic reviews, data science, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data, digital technologies

Abstract

Background. Evidence-based medicine is undergoing profound transformation under the influence of data science, big data technologies, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence. The traditional hierarchy of evidence, primarily centered on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, increasingly reveals methodological constraints, publication bias, and limited applicability in complex real-world clinical environments.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted using systematic and comparative analysis of contemporary scientific publications addressing the evolution of evidence-based medicine and the implementation of data science, big data analytics, Internet of Things technologies, and artificial intelligence in healthcare. An interdisciplinary synthesis approach was applied to evaluate the prospects of integrating hybrid human–artificial intelligence models into modern evidence-based clinical practice.
Results. The analysis indicates that fragmentation of medical data, redundancy of low-quality systematic reviews, and inconsistencies in evidence interpretation reduce the practical value of traditional evidence hierarchies. The integration of large-scale clinical, laboratory, genomic, imaging, and electronic health record data enables the development of predictive analytics and supports personalized, patient-centered care. Machine learning algorithms and hybrid human–AI systems improve evidence interpretation, facilitate clinical decision support, and enhance adaptability to multifactorial and context-dependent medical conditions.
Conclusions. The further development of evidence-based medicine requires dynamic adaptation of its principles through the integration of data science methodologies, standardized data governance, and advanced analytical platforms. Hybrid human-AI collaboration represents a promising paradigm for achieving adaptive, personalized, and scientifically grounded healthcare in the era of digital transformation.

References

Agrawal, S., Magoon, R., Choudhary, N. et al. (2024). Evidence-based medicine: A narrative review on the evolving opportunities and challenges. J. Card. Crit. Care TSS, 8, 122–128. doi: 10.25259/JCCC_51_2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/JCCC_51_2023

Subrahmanya, S. V. G., Shetty, D. K., Patil, V. et al. (2022). The role of data science in healthcare advancements: Applications, benefits, and future prospects. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(4), 1473–1483. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02730-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02730-z

De Mauro, A., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M. (2016). A formal definition of big data based on its essential features. Library Review, 65(3), 122–135. doi: 10.1108/lr-06-2015-0061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2015-0061

Lorkowski, J., Pokorski, M. (2022). Medical records: A historical narrative. Biomedicines, 10(10), 2594. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102594

Gillum, R. F. (2013). From papyrus to the electronic tablet: A brief history of the clinical medical record with lessons for the digital age. American Journal of Medicine, 126(10), 853–857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.024

Angus, D. et al. (2024). The integration of clinical trials with the practice of medicine: Repairing a house divided. JAMA, 332, 153–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4088

Accad, M., Francis, D. (2018). Does evidence- based medicine adversely affect clinical judgment? BMJ, 362, k2799. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2799

Møller, M. H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Darmon, M. (2018). Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure. Intensive Care Medicine, 44, 518–520. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5039-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5039-y

Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Quarterly, 94, 485–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210

Laney, D. (2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety (Application Delivery Strategies, File 949). Stamford, CT: META Group Inc.

Munir, T., Akbar, M. S., Ahmed, S. et al. (2022). A systematic review of internet of things in clinical laboratories: Opportunities, advantages, and challenges. Sensors, 22(20), 8051. doi: 10.3390/s22208051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22208051

Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

Vishnu, S., Jino Ramson, S. R., Jegan, R. (2020). Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): An overview. In 2020 5th International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ ICDCS48716.2020.243558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS48716.2020.243558

Yin, Y., Zeng, Y., Chen, X., Fan, Y. (2016). The internet of things in healthcare: An overview. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 1, 3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2016.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2016.03.004

Columb, M. O., Hopkins, P. M. (2015). Programmes, guidelines and protocols – The antithesis of precision medicine? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 115, 485–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev295

Cho, B., Geng, E., Arvind, V. et al. (2022). Understanding artificial intelligence and predictive analytics: A clinically focused review of machine learning techniques. JBJS Reviews, 10(3), e21.00142. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00142

Bellini, V., Cascella, M., Cutugno, F. et al. (2022). Understanding basic principles of artificial intelligence: A practical guide for intensivists. Acta Biomedica, 93, e2022297.

Gottlieb, M., Kline, J. A., Schneider, A. J., Coates, W. C. (2023). ChatGPT and conversational artificial intelligence: Friend, foe, or future of research? American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 70, 81–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.018

Published

2026-04-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE SCIENCE OF DATA AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE. (2026). Medical Informatics and Engineering, 1-2, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2025.1-2.15990