Subjective and objective assessment of cognitive function in patients with bronchial asthma, arterial hypertension, and their comorbidity

Authors

  • Iryna Melnychaiko I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2136-2675
  • Serhiy Andreychyn I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2026.3.16535

Keywords:

bronchial asthma, arterial hypertension, cognitive function, complaints, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Schulte tables

Abstract

Bronchial asthma and arterial hypertension are common chronic conditions that have both been associated with impaired cognitive function.The coexistence of these conditions may be associated with greater impairment of memory and attention, highlighting the need to assess both subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive performance in this patient population. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of subjective and objective assessment of cognitive function in patients with asthma, arterial hypertension, and their comorbidity. The study included 82 patients stratified into three groups: Group I comprised patients with bronchial asthma (n=25), Group II comprised patients with arterial hypertension (n=20), and Group III comprised patients with coexisting bronchial asthma and arterial hypertension (n=37). The control group (CG) included 21 apparently healthy individuals. Subjective assessment was based on the analysis of cognitive complaints, whereas objective assessment was performed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Schulte tables. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 10.0 software, with the Mann – Whitney U test, Pearson’s chi-square test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient applied as appropriate. Cognitive complaints were most frequently reported by patients with coexisting bronchial asthma and arterial hypertension (59.5 %). This group also had the lowest median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score, 22.00 [20.00; 24.00], and the longest median Schulte table completion time, 54.00 s [47.00; 59.00]. Schulte table completion time was significantly longer among patients reporting cognitive complaints in the asthma group and in patients with coexisting asthma and arterial hypertension, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in group II. Spearman correlation analysis revealed weak to moderate correlations between the number of cognitive complaints and objective measures of cognitive performance. The number of complaints correlated negatively with the MoCA score and positively with Schulte table completion time. Cognitive complaints were associated with poorer performance on objective cognitive tests; however, weak and moderate correlations suggest that the number of subjective complaints does not always reflect the severity of cognitive impairment. These findings underscore the importance of cognitive assessment in patients with coexisting bronchial asthma and arterial hypertension, based not only on subjective complaints but also on standardized cognitive test results.

Author Biographies

  • Iryna Melnychaiko, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

    PHD Student

  • Serhiy Andreychyn, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University

    Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor

References

1. GBD 2021 Asthma and Allergic Diseases Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of asthma and atopic dermatitis, 1990–2021, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Respir Med. 2025;13(5):425-46. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00003-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00003-7

2. Di Raimondo D, Musiari G, Benfante A, et al. Prevalence of arterial hypertension and characteristics of nocturnal blood pressure profile of asthma patients according to therapy and severity of the disease: The BADA study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6925. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186925

3. Cazzola M, Page CP, Hanania NA, et al. Asthma and cardiovascular diseases: Navigating mutual pharmacological interferences. Drugs. 2024;84:1251-73. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02086-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02086-5

4. Visca D, Ardesi F, Zappa M, et al. Asthma and hypertension: The role of airway inflammation. Front Med. 2024;11:1451625. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1451625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1451625

5. Bushi G, Khatib MN, Gaidhane S, et al. Prevalence and risk of cognitive impairment among patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2025;15(3):e70048. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70048

6. Kroll JL, Steele AM, Pinkham AE, Ritz T. Asthma, the central nervous system, and neurocognition: Current findings, potential mechanisms, and treatment implications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;148:105063. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105063

7. Wei W, Ma D, Li L, Zhang L. Cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease induced by hypertension. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19(7):1454–62. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.385841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.385841

8. Christiansen SC, Schatz M, Yang SJ, et al. Hypertension and asthma: A comorbid relationship. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(1):76–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.009

9. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(3):271–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0

10. Zhou C, Fares M, Wilson JD, Sheppard DP, Evans JD, Pirogovsky-Turk E. Subjective cognitive decline and objective cognitive performance in older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. J Neuropsychol. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12384

11. Van Patten R, Mulhauser K, Austin TA, et al. The association between subjective and objective cognitive functioning from a transdiagnostic perspective: An umbrella review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2025;121:102648. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102648

12. Smid J, Studart-Neto A, Gouveia KG, et al. Subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia — Syndromic approach: Recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Dement Neuropsychol. 2022;16(3 Suppl 1):1–24. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-S101EN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2022-s101en

13. Smith D, Lovell J, Weller C, Kennedy B, Winbolt M, Young C, Ibrahim J. A systematic review of medication non-adherence in persons with dementia or cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170651. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170651

14. Hu J., Ma H., Ning Z. et al. Asthma and cognitive dysfunction in older adults: the mediating role of systemic immune-inflammation index. Sci. Rep. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 27194. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76393-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76393-y

15. Muela H. C. S., Costa-Hong V. A., Yassuda M. S. et al. Hypertension severity is associated with impaired cognitive performance. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. e004579. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004579

16. Vintimilla R., Mathew E., Hall J. et al. Subjective cognitive complaints and cardiovascular risk factors in older Mexican Americans: a cross-sectional study. Cerebral Circulation – Cognition and Behavior. 2022;3:100126. DOI: 10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100126

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Subjective and objective assessment of cognitive function in patients with bronchial asthma, arterial hypertension, and their comorbidity. (2026). Bulletin of Medical and Biological Research, 3, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2026.3.16535