MEDICAL ERRORS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF PHYSICIANS IN TERNOPIL REGION (UKRAINE)

V. V. Franchuk

Abstract


Background. The professional occupation of a doctor quite often meets different imperfections, which have negative outcome for patients.

Objective. The study was aimed to investigate the expert characteristics of improper performance of the professional duties by medical staff on the example of a particular region of Ukraine.

Methods. In the study the archival materials (commission on forensic medical examinations) held in Ternopil Regional Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination in 2007-2014 years were analysed. The research results are summarized and processed with the use of general statistical methods.

Results. It is defined that during this period 112 examinations concerning medical malpractice were implemented (9.05% of all commission examinations).

Conclusions. Medical errors were combined, especially during the diagnostics, treatment and in medical records. The majority of cases (82.1%) of medical malpractice were caused by the objective reasons.


Keywords


medical malpractice; medical errors; forensic medical examinations; dereliction of duty by medical personnel; negligence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


James, John T. A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care. Journal of Patient Safety 2013; 9(3): 122–128.

Shepherd R. Medical malpractice (in). Simpson’s Forensic medicine. London. Arnold publisher; 2003: 15–26.

Narayan Reddy K.S. Professional negligence (malpraxis) (in). The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. Hyderabad. K. Suguna Devi publisher; 2006: 30–45.

Sorensen B, Lynnerup N. Fatal outcome after unintended events following medical intervention: a forensic pathological case survey. RRFMS 2014; 4: 11–17.

Anupam B. Jena, Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla, Amitabh Chandra. Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 629–636.

Meng You, Xu Wang, Di Lu, Haidong Zhang, Shengli Di, Fengqin Zhang et al. Analyses of Medical Malpractice in Judicial Appraisal: 505 Cases. Forensic Sci Med 2015; 1: 21–25.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2016.2.7029

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.